2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic differences in soybean yield responses to increasing temperature in a cool climate are related to maturity group

Abstract: To adapt soybean production to climate change, a thorough understanding of its response to high temperature is required. Modeling studies have predicted that high temperature would shorten the growth period and hence lower seed yield of less day length-sensitive (early-maturing) soybean cultivars, whereas the magnitude of yield reduction by high temperature would be smaller in cultivars with higher day length sensitivity (late-maturing), suggesting that late-maturing cultivars would benefit from a future high-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
42
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrasting with the MONICA results, Kumagai and Sameshima (2014) observed that a cultivar with a longer flowering period and, consequently, longer complete cycle, had higher yield, due to increased leaf area, photosynthesis and number of flowers, pods and seeds. This was not observed when using MONICA model because the maximum effective root depth was limited to 0.75 m during the calibration, a condition that led to increased yield penalization by water deficit in the longer cycles of maturity groups 6.8 and 7.8 (SPEHAR et al, 2015).…”
Section: Maturity Groupcontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrasting with the MONICA results, Kumagai and Sameshima (2014) observed that a cultivar with a longer flowering period and, consequently, longer complete cycle, had higher yield, due to increased leaf area, photosynthesis and number of flowers, pods and seeds. This was not observed when using MONICA model because the maximum effective root depth was limited to 0.75 m during the calibration, a condition that led to increased yield penalization by water deficit in the longer cycles of maturity groups 6.8 and 7.8 (SPEHAR et al, 2015).…”
Section: Maturity Groupcontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The reduction of yield is attributed mainly to the shorter crop cycle, as also observed by and Kumagai and Sameshima (2014). The only exception was for FAO model that had a slight positive response, between 2 e 21 kg ha -1 °C -1 in some specific conditions (site x temperature increase) ( Table 3).…”
Section: Temperature Responsesmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulations on air temperature changes shows a direct influence on the phenological stages duration in soybean. Kumagai and Sameshima (2014) detected that the duration from days of sowing to the beginning of soybean flowering decreased with an increase in temperature for all studied cultivars. Thus, an increase of the flowering period with a consequently increase in the number of open flowers, could result in an increase in pods and grains for late maturity cultivars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibition of seedling emergence and therefore of canopy development that occurs at low temperatures was not observed in any year, even in 2013, when the May weather was slightly colder than the long-term average. As Horai et al 2013 Kumagai et al 2012, Kumagai andSameshima, 2014;Kumagai et al, 2015 . I hypothesize that early sowing may be more successful in the future and that soybean production will therefore increase if temperatures continue to increase in this region owing to global warming.…”
Section: Journal Of Agricultural Meteorologymentioning
confidence: 99%