2015
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic diversity and differentiation among populations of two benthic freshwater diatoms as revealed by microsatellites

Abstract: Given their large population sizes and presumed high dispersal capacity, protists are expected to exhibit homogeneous population structure over large spatial scales. On the other hand, the fragmented and short-lived nature of the lentic freshwater habitats that many protists inhabit promotes strong population differentiation. We used microsatellites in two benthic freshwater diatoms, Eunotia bilunaris 'robust' and Sellaphora capitata, sampled from within a pond and connected ponds, through isolated ponds from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(176 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intra-population gene flow, exerted by frequent sexual events in a relatively secluded environment, may explain this long-term genetic homogenization in S. marinoi (Godhe et al, 2014). Among diatom populations there is thus evidence for both short-term differentiation (Saravanan and Godhe, 2010;Vanormelingen et al, 2015;Godhe et al, 2016), as also reported in the present study and likely driven by clonality, and long-term homogenization (Härnström et al, 2011), driven by sexual recombination.…”
Section: Population Genetic Structuresupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intra-population gene flow, exerted by frequent sexual events in a relatively secluded environment, may explain this long-term genetic homogenization in S. marinoi (Godhe et al, 2014). Among diatom populations there is thus evidence for both short-term differentiation (Saravanan and Godhe, 2010;Vanormelingen et al, 2015;Godhe et al, 2016), as also reported in the present study and likely driven by clonality, and long-term homogenization (Härnström et al, 2011), driven by sexual recombination.…”
Section: Population Genetic Structuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Nonetheless, low diversity was observed in some cases: the dominance of asexual reproduction and clonal evolution were considered at the base of the relatively low genotypic richness (0.667) reported for the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi during a bloom in the North Sea (Krueger-Hadfield et al, 2014). Extremely low genotypic richness (down to~0) was also reported for a benthic freshwater diatom collected in small pond (Vanormelingen et al, 2015), although the hypothesis of clonal expansion could not be investigated due to the limited number of samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extremely high genetic differentiation between populations of a single species is unusual, although similar levels have been documented over large geographic scales in sponges (Chaves-Fonnegra et al, 2015), coastal sharks (Ashe et al, 2015) and marine mammals (Fruet et al, 2014), but also at distances o100 km in terrestrial animals (Sethuraman et al, 2013) or freshwater diatoms (Vanormelingen et al, 2015). Our results indicate that the populations of L. brevirostris α present clear geographic boundaries and are consistent with two of the characteristics of a metapopulation model (Grimm et al, 2003): (1) local populations have their own dynamics and (2) they are connected by limited dispersal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Exploring the extent of population structure and its causes can be used to test between the ubiquity and moderate endemicity models, as the former predicts a lack of divergence in allopatry or isolation by distance, and little evidence for recent speciation events, in contrast to what is observed in many plants and animals. Evidence for genetically structured populations has recently been reported across a variety of taxa and habitats, including examples from ciliates (Zufall, Dimond, & Doerder, 2013), amoebae (Douglas, Kronforst, Queller, & Strassmann, 2011;Heger, Mitchell, & Leander, 2013), diatoms (Casteleyn et al, 2010;Sjöqvist, Godhe, Jonsson, Sundqvist, & Kremp, 2015;Vanormelingen et al, 2015;Whittaker & Rynearson, 2017), dinoflagellates (Lowe, Martin, Montagnes, & Watts, 2012;Rengefors, Logares, & Laybourn-Parry, 2012), raphidophytes (Lebret, Tesson, Kritzberg, Tomas, & Rengefors, 2015) and fungi (Carriconde et al, 2008;Ellison et al, 2011). While many of these studies showed clear evidence for geographic structure (supporting the moderate endemicity model), the majority were limited in resolution due to the small number of marker loci used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%