2013
DOI: 10.5958/j.2229-4473.26.1.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic Response of Sugarcane Under Induced Moisture Deficit Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be due to the fact that varieties Co 0238 and CoS 767 maintained higher RWC content, water potential, photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance at 40% (mild stress) and 30% (severe stress) ASM levels than CoH 128 and CoJ 64. Genotypic differences in relation to moisture stress condition have also been observed byMeena et al (2013);Yadav and Prasad (1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It may be due to the fact that varieties Co 0238 and CoS 767 maintained higher RWC content, water potential, photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance at 40% (mild stress) and 30% (severe stress) ASM levels than CoH 128 and CoJ 64. Genotypic differences in relation to moisture stress condition have also been observed byMeena et al (2013);Yadav and Prasad (1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Approximately 2.97 lakh ha of cane area is drought prone affecting the crop at one or other stage of growth in every state of India (Vision 2030 Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore). Soil moisture deficit coincide with summer period, creating imbalance of water potential in plant tissues, affecting crop growth and development leading to drastic reductions in cane growth and quality (Meena et al 2013). Taking into consideration imparting drought during formative phase of crop growth may be useful in identifying drought tolerant genotypes because growth behavior of different varieties remains in different soil and agro-climatic conditions in response to change in rhizospheric environment under irrigated and un-irrigated conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought has the greatest impact on complex traits such as shoot, leaf, and root parameters; however, their genetic control varies between genotypes. Under water stress, highly exploitable genetic variation for cane and sugar yield was observed ( Hemaprabha et al., 2006 ; Meena et al., 2013 ; Basnayake et al., 2015 ; Meena et al., 2020 ). Through conventional breeding, varieties that have high yield and high sucrose content and are drought tolerant are produced.…”
Section: Breeding For Drought and Salt Tolerance In Sugarcanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation in genotypic response for different cane parameters depends upon the duration and intensity of stress. The response of highly exploitable genetic variation for cane and sugar yield was observed under water stress (Hemaprabha et al 2004(Hemaprabha et al , 2006Vasantha et al 2005;Basnayake et al 2012;Meena et al 2013Meena et al , 2014. Among various morphological traits, shoot parameters such as stalk height, tiller population, stalk diameter, stalk weight, number of millable canes; leaf parameters such as length and width of leaves and number of green leaves; and root parameters such as root length, root surface area, and volume are most affected under drought stress (Table 4).…”
Section: Selection For Drought-tolerant Clonesmentioning
confidence: 99%