1992
DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs1951.42.737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic variation for 17 isozyme genes among Japanese upland varieties in rice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These characteristics are quite different from those of the lowland cultivars. Also, in genetic markers including 17 isozyme loci and five RFLP markers, the variation in nuclear genotypes of the Japanese upland cultivars was different from that in the lowland population (Ishikawa et al1991(Ishikawa et al , 1992(Ishikawa et al , 1997. The most-remarkable distinction occurred in the genoype of locus Pgd1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These characteristics are quite different from those of the lowland cultivars. Also, in genetic markers including 17 isozyme loci and five RFLP markers, the variation in nuclear genotypes of the Japanese upland cultivars was different from that in the lowland population (Ishikawa et al1991(Ishikawa et al , 1992(Ishikawa et al , 1997. The most-remarkable distinction occurred in the genoype of locus Pgd1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have never detected heterozygotes in current genetic resources of the Japanese lowland and upland cultivars in comparison to that of Laotian genetic resources. This is because in Japan there are few indica strains as a pollen donor or a cytoplasmic donor (Ishikawa et al 1991(Ishikawa et al , 1992. In the past, however, several cultivars in the Daitou-mai group, genetically determined as indica cultivars (Ishikawa et al 1992), were cultivated around japonica cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As these differentiations were also detected with enzyme variation by electrophoresis (Chu 1967;Shahi et al 1969;Pai et al 1975), such biochemical markers were preferred to recognize the indica and japonica types because the markers accurately reflected their nuclear compositions (Sano and Morishima 1992). This method was also applied to evaluate the genetic resources of Japanese lowland and upland cultivars (Ishikawa et al 1991(Ishikawa et al , 1992. In our former report (Ishikawa et al 1992), a few indica cultivars could be recognized, based on their isozyme genotype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%