2000
DOI: 10.1626/pps.3.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic Variation in Response of Rainfed Lowland Rice to Drought and Rewatering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, lines were found to adapt to changing soil conditions in different ways as drought progressed. Consistent with the results of Azhiri-Sigari et al (2000) and Kamoshita et al (2000) in the greenhouse, IR58821 and CT9993 were more able to develop roots at depth, while IR62266 was slower in extracting water from depth but favored osmotic adjustment. Similar results were obtained in controlled conditions by Babu et al (2001).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, lines were found to adapt to changing soil conditions in different ways as drought progressed. Consistent with the results of Azhiri-Sigari et al (2000) and Kamoshita et al (2000) in the greenhouse, IR58821 and CT9993 were more able to develop roots at depth, while IR62266 was slower in extracting water from depth but favored osmotic adjustment. Similar results were obtained in controlled conditions by Babu et al (2001).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The percentage of root axes that penetrated the artificial hardpan was greater in CT9993 than in IR62266 under both well-watered (66% and 53%, respectively) and drought treatments (56% and 47%), respectively. The greater inherent ability of CT9993 to elongate roots at depth was also reported by Azhiri-Sigari et al (2000), and was consistent with field studies (Samson et al, 2002), and other wax-layer experiments (Babu et al, The similar Ψ L and g s of the plants grown under both soft and hard wax layers under all water regimes with or without root severing implied a negligible effect of impedance on root signals in this study (Fig. 4a, b, c), which differs from other reports (Mulholland et al, 1996;Hussain et al, 1999;Roberts et al, 2002).…”
Section: Root Signals In Response To Mechanical Impedance In the Greementioning
confidence: 52%
“…This plasticity in root system development is functionally effective and efficient for the enhancement of water uptake especially under mild water deficit conditions (Kano-Nakata et al, 2011). On the other hand, it has been well established that deep rooting avoids drought-induced stress by extracting available water from the deep soil layers (Azhiri-Sigari et al, 2000;Kato et al, 2007;Gowda et al, 2011). A typical example of advantageous effects of deep rooting were recently reported by Uga et al (2011), who mapped a quantitative trait locus (QTL) for deep rooting, DEEPER ROOTING 1 (DRO1) that enables rice plants to produce more grains under drought-induced stress without yield penalty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences of the two parental lines was characterized under both stress and non-stress conditions in the greenhouse and in the field. 24 The rice genotypes exhibiting high proline accumulation had a marked effect on the ability to maintain water status, consequently delayed tissue death and leaf senescence in rice under water stress. 8 The ability to survive during drought and recovery periods affects the yield of rainfed rice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%