2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium perfringens isolated from dromedary camels, pastures and herders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multidrug resistance was observed in 92% of the isolates, of which 26% were XDR, and the MAR indices ranged from 0.28 to 0.9 with an average of 0.63. These findings conform with previous studies that showed the wide spread of MDR and XDR C. perfringens isolates due to the uncontrolled use of these drugs as growth promoters in animals and for therapeutic uses in humans and animals, which has caused increased resistance [59,62]. It has been shown that MAR higher than 0.2 could be due to contamination from high-risk sources, such as humans and farm animals frequently exposed to antibiotics, thus resulting in potential risk to consumers [73].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Multidrug resistance was observed in 92% of the isolates, of which 26% were XDR, and the MAR indices ranged from 0.28 to 0.9 with an average of 0.63. These findings conform with previous studies that showed the wide spread of MDR and XDR C. perfringens isolates due to the uncontrolled use of these drugs as growth promoters in animals and for therapeutic uses in humans and animals, which has caused increased resistance [59,62]. It has been shown that MAR higher than 0.2 could be due to contamination from high-risk sources, such as humans and farm animals frequently exposed to antibiotics, thus resulting in potential risk to consumers [73].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Fewer studies have documented the isolation of C. perfringens from camels; in our study, 18% of diarrheic feces from camels were identified, and all nine isolates were of type A, of which seven (77.8%) and three (33.3%) were positive for cpb 2 and cpe genes, respectively. According to Fayez, Elsohaby [ 62 ], the isolation of C. perfringens from diarrheic calves and adults was 73.7%, and most of the isolates were of type A. Moreover, other studies have reported that C. perfringens type A is the predominant type from camels and other animals [ 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another study in Iran reported that 52% of sheep isolates were cpb2 positive in PCR assay, in which 9 of 13 (69%) and 4 of 13 (31%) isolates were taken from diseased and healthy sheep, respectively (Yadegar et al 2018). Mohiuddin et al (2020), showed the percentage of positive isolates for cpb2 was remarkably higher in the diseased population (64%) of sheep and goats, compared to the healthy population (37%), also Fayez et al (2020) indicate that all C. perfringens isolates were found to be associated with cpb2+ genes, were detected only in diarrheic cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study conducted in sheep meat, C. perfringens type A was not detected, and types B, C, and D were isolated [33]. All types of C. perfringens are commensal in the gastrointestinal tract of animals, therefore, contamination during slaughter and butchering could be the primary source of C. perfringens in meats [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%