2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.05.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotyping, antimicrobial resistance and virulence factor gene profiles of vancomycin resistance Enterococcus faecalis isolated from blood culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
12
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, more than 45% of the strains were VRE. Notable resistance to vancomycin among E. faecalis strains was similar to several studies in the country [38,39]. Moreover, increasing VRE prevalence among hospitalized patients was also reported previously from southwestern Iran [40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this study, more than 45% of the strains were VRE. Notable resistance to vancomycin among E. faecalis strains was similar to several studies in the country [38,39]. Moreover, increasing VRE prevalence among hospitalized patients was also reported previously from southwestern Iran [40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…b The data are given as the means of the results from three independent experiment. WT wild-type/parent strain; −, 0.83 ≤ △clpP/WT ratio ≤ 1.2 FsrABDC signal transduction system and GelE are major virulence factors in E. faecalis [41,42]. Thus, it may be that the increased abundances of FsrA and GelE leads enhance virulence of the ΔclpP mutant strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of great importance to determine the clonal relationships among VRE isolates in order to take effective control measures and limiting spread of these microorganisms. For this purpose, numerous molecular typing methods such as randomly amplified polymorphic DNA, pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multi locus sequence typing, have been developed (16)(17)(18). However, each of these methods has differences in the reproducibility and discriminatory abilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%