a low cost, flexible and quick process to fabricate microchannels keeps increasing.Historically, the majority of the initial microfluidics work was done using glass-or silicon-made microfluidic devices (Harrison et al. 1992;Wilding et al. 1994;Woolley and Mathies 1994;Jiang et al. 1995) using techniques like wet and dry etching. In the mid-1990s, a revolution in the fabrication of microfluidics took place with the advent of soft lithography, where a master mold is used to make poly-dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) replicas by casting (Dong et al. 1996;Xia and Whitesides 1998;Duffy et al. 1998). Soft lithography is now a standard for microfluidic prototyping, in part because it enables a relatively inexpensive and rapid fabrication. As long as a master mold is available, experimental microfluidics devices can be made in few hours without the need for a cleanroom. However, the master molds are still mostly fabricated in a cleanroom following a number of processes including dry etching of silicon, and especially SU-8 photolithography (Martinez-Duarte and Madou 2011). As expected, the resolution and achievable complexity of the master mold depend highly on the choice of fabrication technique. For example, microchannels with features of even 100 nm are possible to fabricate using electron beam lithography (Rogers and Nuzzo 2005; Alom Ruiz and Chen 2007). However, most microfluidic devices would feature dimensions from the tens of micrometers to several hundreds, achievable with conventional SU-8 photolithography.Other relatively inexpensive fabrication techniques are printer based, such as that presented by Carrilho et al. (2009) who selectively deposited hydrophobic wax on regular paper to create channel walls. In this particular case, the cross section of the channel is not empty, but contains fibers that facilitate the wicking of the sample throughout the fluidic network. Bruzewicz et al. (2008) also demonstrated a Abstract In this paper, we focus on characterizing the limits of xurography, or patterning with a razor blade, of a pressure-sensitive double-sided adhesive. This is a rapid, inexpensive technique to fabricate robust microfluidics devices. Straight, curved and square serpentine as well as zigzag channels of different dimensions are studied. General guidelines are provided to assess feasibility of a particular geometry a priori. The mechanics of the cut are explored with the aim at identifying the bottlenecks that limit the maximum resolution achieved in xurography of adhesive films. A number of advantages and disadvantages of this technique compared to other common fabrication techniques are also provided.