It is a pleasure to comment on "Revaluing Work after COVID-19." It is a thoughtful and timely essay, and I look forward to adding it my syllabi for next year. In my brief commentary, I am going to offer some thoughts on the article and put it into conversation with work from across Jane Collins's wide-ranging and inspirational body of scholarship, of which I can only offer a small sample.What we gain from Collins's work is a method for understanding how macro-level changes in the economy manifest in specific, everyday worlds and lives. Unwaged and reproductive labor have always been essential to capitalism. This is an important theme of feminist economic anthropology, but it is most often remembered, it seems, in times of crisis. The problem that Collins addresses in this Anthropology of Work Review (AWR) article, as well as in her wider work, is how differently positioned people do that remembering-how they put waged and unwaged, productive and reproductive, back into relation with one another. What Collins (2017) calls the "politics of value" hinges in part on this question.If we contextualize this article in the longer arc of Collins's work, we might say-to adapt a phrase from her collaborator Catherine Lutz-that crisis is in the details (Lutz, 2006; see also Lutz and Collins, 1993). In moments of relative and perceived stability (or is it just complacency?), power rests on the fiction of a neat separation between the productive and the unproductive.Crisis crumbles that fiction, creating opportunities for new ways of making the economy (Collins, 2017). Here is one of the key lessons of Collins's work: Paying attention to the specific ways people confront that crumbling fiction is a means of reminding ourselves that the economy is always in the process of being made. Its form is never given.Understanding economic crisis, then, is not just a matter of diagnosing goings-on at macro-level scales. Understanding crisis is also a matter, as Lutz (2006, 594) suggests, of making the economy's "human face and frailty" more visible.This AWR article is just the latest instantiation of Collins's unique ability to help us understand crisis, in all its detail, without becoming demoralized by its enormity. To be sure, there are many ways to approach crisis ethnographically without falling into the trap of sensationalism or broad generalization. Collins's approach is to start with work. This does not mean that she equates work with life or reduces social life to labor relations; rather, it means that she recognizes that the act of theorizing the economy as it is, and as it might be otherwise, has historically occurred in the labor process. It is in people's actions and attachments. In Collins's scholarship, work-and the work of social reproduction in particular-has a paradoxical way of cutting the economy down to size, even as work undergirds the economy.I want to walk through a chain of political-economic crises overviewed in Collins's scholarship. This is in no way exhaustive. It is a little taste, in hopes that you, the re...