2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10653-017-9971-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geo-accumulation index and contamination factors of heavy metals (Zn and Pb) in urban river sediment

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to appraise the levels of heavy metal contamination (Zn and Pb) in sediment of the Langat River (Selangor, Malaysia). Samples were collected randomly from 15 sampling stations located along the Langat River. The parameters measured were pH, redox potential, salinity, electrical conductivity, loss of ignition, cation exchanges capacity (Na, Mg, Ca, K), and metal ions (Zn and Pb). The geo-accumulation index (I ) and contamination factor (C) were applied to determine and classify … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lake sediment records have been widely used to determine temporal trends of a broad range of pollutants including trace metals (Boyle et al 1998 ; Yang et al 2002 , 2010 ); persistent organic pollutants (Rose et al 2001 ; Yang et al 2016 ), pharmaceuticals (Kerrigan et al 2018 ) and fly-ash particles (Rose et al 2012 ; Rose 2015 ). However, despite a number of approaches employed to determine the effects of sediment contaminant mixtures to aquatic biota (for example Probable Effects Concentration Quotients (PEC-Qs), Ingersoll et al 2001 ; toxicity units (TUs), Lahr et al 2003 ; Hazard Quotients (HQs), Feng et al 2011 ; geoaccumulation indices (I geo ), Haris et al 2017 ), these have mainly been applied to surface sediments. Only rarely have these techniques been used with lake sediment records to determine historic toxic effects, even though this would allow contemporary status to be placed in an historical perspective such that directions of change (deterioration; improvement) could be determined as well as, perhaps more importantly, rates of change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lake sediment records have been widely used to determine temporal trends of a broad range of pollutants including trace metals (Boyle et al 1998 ; Yang et al 2002 , 2010 ); persistent organic pollutants (Rose et al 2001 ; Yang et al 2016 ), pharmaceuticals (Kerrigan et al 2018 ) and fly-ash particles (Rose et al 2012 ; Rose 2015 ). However, despite a number of approaches employed to determine the effects of sediment contaminant mixtures to aquatic biota (for example Probable Effects Concentration Quotients (PEC-Qs), Ingersoll et al 2001 ; toxicity units (TUs), Lahr et al 2003 ; Hazard Quotients (HQs), Feng et al 2011 ; geoaccumulation indices (I geo ), Haris et al 2017 ), these have mainly been applied to surface sediments. Only rarely have these techniques been used with lake sediment records to determine historic toxic effects, even though this would allow contemporary status to be placed in an historical perspective such that directions of change (deterioration; improvement) could be determined as well as, perhaps more importantly, rates of change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical composition of stream waters can be affected in various ways by elements occurring in bottom sediments. Some minerals may help stabilize the composition of stream water due to their buffering capacity and others may cause precipitation of dissolved ions (Haris et al 2017). What's more, sediment acts as a metal reservoir and constitutes a sensible indicator of the background pollution of the watercourse (Shafie et al 2014).…”
Section: Bottom Sedimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Cx is the concentration of metal x in the sediment sample and Bx is the background or reference value of metal x. In order to compensate for the variations due to the lithogenic effects, a 1.5 background matrix factor is used (Haris et al 2017). The classification of geo-accumulation index is given in Table 4.…”
Section: Geo-accumulation Index (I Geo )mentioning
confidence: 99%