Geo3DML: A standard-based exchange format for 3D geological models

Wang, Zhangang; Qu, Honggang; Wu, Zixing; Wang, Xianghong

doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2017.09.008

Cited by 10 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, it is essential to determine the potential risks and unexpected issues that may influence the construction. This may lead to raise a lot of questions regarding the importance to create 3D City model that accommodates both surface and subsurface spatial objects (Bisheng et al, 1999;Duncan and Rahman, 2013;Gemeda, 2012;Kolbe and Gröger, 2003;Rienzo et al, 2008;Salim, 2017;van den Brink et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2018;Yan et al, 2018) .…”

Section: Need For Subsurface Spatial Objects Within the 3d Sdimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integration Between Surface and Subsurface Spatial Objects for Developing Oman 3d Sdi Based on the Citygml Standard

Kalbani

Rahman

2019

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The paper investigates the capability to integrate the surface and subsurface 3D spatial objects data structure within the 3D spatial data infrastructure (3D SDI) based on the CityGML standards. In fact, a number of countries around the world have started applying the 3D city models for their planning and infrastructure management. While others are still working toward 3D SDI by using CityGML standards. Moreover, most of these initiatives focus on the surface spatial objects with less interest to model subsurface spatial objects. However, dealing with 3D SDI requires both surface and subsurface spatial objects with clear consideration on the issues and challenges in terms of the data structure. On the other hand, the study has used geospatial tools and databases such as FME, PostgreSQL-PostGIS, and 3D City Database to generate the 3D model and to test the capability for integrating the surface and subsurface 3D spatial objects data structure within the 3D SDI. This paper concludes by describing a framework that aims to integrate surface and subsurface 3D geospatial objects data structure in Oman SDI. The authors believe that there are possible solutions based on CityGML standards for surface and subsurface 3D spatial objects. Moreover, solving the issues in data structure can establish a better vision and open new avenues for the 3D SDI.

show abstract

Section: Need For Subsurface Spatial Objects Within the 3d Sdimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, the Geo3DML has accommodated various geological models including drills, cross-sections/geo-maps, and 3D models. Additionally, the Geo3DML uses the same OGC standards and GML extensions (Wang et al, 2018).…”

Section: Need For Subsurface Spatial Objects Within the 3d Sdimentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration Between Surface and Subsurface Spatial Objects for Developing Oman 3d Sdi Based on the Citygml Standard

Kalbani

Rahman

2019

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, models are used not only for resource estimation but also for identifying problems in the drilling and development of the fields (Radwan, 2022). 3D geological models are a digital representation of the structure and properties of subsoils (Nurgatin & Lysov, 2014;Wang et al, 2018). The study of geological structure with the construction of 3D geological models of exploration areas based on generalized data of analog fields, seismic data, and lithological and facies analysis is relevant and economically viable (Zakrevskii et al, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integration of a Low Gas-Saturated Zone in Creating a 3D Model of the Medvezhye Field

Shirjaev,

Vaganov,

Naumenko

2023

QAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

3D geological modeling is an integral part of reserves estimation and project documentation for the development of gas and oil fields. The developed 3D geological model of the Cenomanian productive complex including the low gas-saturated zone of the Medvezhye field represents a combination of data from the drilling of 350 wells, the structural features of the reservoir, permeability properties determined on cores, seismic surveys, and the results of geophysical well surveys. Based on examining the available well logs recorded in the Medvezhye field wells, the low gas-saturated zone is integrated into the construction of the 3D geological model of the Medvezhye field of the Cenomanian productive complex. A total of three models are constructed, and a 400*400*0.4 m grid is recommended for further hydrodynamic modeling. A comparison of the three grids suggests that a more detailed model delivers more thorough results, however, heavy models cannot be applied to hydrodynamic modeling. Resource estimations do not differ across the three grids significantly.

show abstract

“…Due to the flexibility offered by parametric design, other approaches that involve the use of Visual Programming Languages (VPLs) and dynamic 3D modelling for geology for the design and execution of large-scale infrastructure projects have recently been developed [21]. To provide sufficient integration, several actions that manage/modify the subsoil and its geo-related data and hydrogeological and geotechnical objects and properties must be performed [22,23]. This type of integration would make relevant data available at any stage, and drastically decrease data loss between the two domains.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Geotechnical Data to GeoBIM Models: Testing Strategies for an Ex-Industrial Site in Turin

Fonsati,

Cosentini,

Tundo

et al. 2023

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the years, the use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) methods has changed the workflows of various actors, providing better integration across different domains and allowing for new ways of working. This paper outlines the interest towards the integration of BIM with geotechnical/geological modelling (GeoBIM), which still represents a major challenge in several respects. The present study aims to provide a flexible method for assessing various integration strategies and to establish a preferred workflow based on the selected requirements and preference parameters. This integration is designed to provide a final federated model that can also be archived in the as-built documentation. Four alternative processes were selected to analyse the specific types of data and transformations required in the process. Each process was applied on a real case study in order to test the developed assessment framework using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Due to technological advances, modelling and integration workflows change rapidly; however, our results show that the proposed evaluation framework is universal and adaptable to any new integration approach. Further research efforts must be undertaken to reduce attribute data losses and enhance the interoperability between systems and professionals.

show abstract

Geo3DML: A standard-based exchange format for 3D geological models

Cited by 10 publications

References 26 publications

Integration Between Surface and Subsurface Spatial Objects for Developing Oman 3d Sdi Based on the Citygml Standard

Integration Between Surface and Subsurface Spatial Objects for Developing Oman 3d Sdi Based on the Citygml Standard

Integration of a Low Gas-Saturated Zone in Creating a 3D Model of the Medvezhye Field

From Geotechnical Data to GeoBIM Models: Testing Strategies for an Ex-Industrial Site in Turin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About