2023
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2022.3211294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geoacoustic Inversion Using Simple Hand-Deployable Acoustic Systems

Abstract: This article proposes the use of a simple, low-cost, hand-deployable pair of experimental assets to conduct geoacoustic inversion at sea. The system consists of an expendable, fully mechanical acoustic source called a rupture induced underwater sound source (RIUSS) and a new ropeless passive acoustic mooring called a TOSSIT (not an acronym). Used together, RIUSS and TOSSIT enable the collection of acoustic data suitable to perform single-hydrophone geoacoustic inversion. The method is illustrated using data co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subbottom depth of this layer in the inversion results corresponds closely to that of a seismic reflector interpreted to represent the transition from mud to a sand layer [9]. The seabed profiles agree well with other geoacosutic inversion results (computed with known SSPs) at the NEMP, e.g., [5,11,12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The subbottom depth of this layer in the inversion results corresponds closely to that of a seismic reflector interpreted to represent the transition from mud to a sand layer [9]. The seabed profiles agree well with other geoacosutic inversion results (computed with known SSPs) at the NEMP, e.g., [5,11,12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Hence, this paper considers an approach to geoacoustic inversion that accounts for lack of knowledge of the water column by carrying out joint trans-D Bayesian inversion for both the water SSP and the seabed geoacoustic model. The approach is validated here by application to modal-dispersion data collected on the New England Much Patch (NEMP) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize uncertainties in the estimation of seabed parameters, researchers have developed signal processing techniques to derive pertinent details from acoustic field data, such as sound pressure or amplitude phase [9], waveguide invariants [10], reflection coefficient versus angle [11,12] data, etc. The inversion methods using modal amplitude ratio [13], green function [14,15], modal group speed dispersion [16] and vertical coherence [17] have been discussed by Zhou et al [18], while the most widely used characteristic of propagating normal modes is modal group speed dispersion [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%