1975
DOI: 10.1016/0012-8252(75)90038-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geoanalytic applications of particle tracks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An attempt was made to date glass by the fission track technique (Fleischer and Price, 1964). The U content was determined to be only 6 ppb, instead of the 75-300 ppb anticipated (Fisher, 1975). This low U content leads to an extremely low fossil track density (Table 2).…”
Section: Fission Track Age Of Glass (Def)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An attempt was made to date glass by the fission track technique (Fleischer and Price, 1964). The U content was determined to be only 6 ppb, instead of the 75-300 ppb anticipated (Fisher, 1975). This low U content leads to an extremely low fossil track density (Table 2).…”
Section: Fission Track Age Of Glass (Def)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U content was determined by counting neutroninduced tracks on an interior surface, and has a large uncertainty (±50%) (Fisher, 1975). In view of the lack of positive results for the age determination, a more precise determination of the U content was not attempted.…”
Section: Fission Track Age Of Glass (Def)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection sensitivity (10 −12 gg −1 ) of uranium determination in natural water is much higher than those of other methods (Fisher, 1975). The large range of detection limits results, from the use of differentirradiation times and different neutron fluxes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In general, it is difficult to analyse directly such small quantities of uranium in water by routine chemical means. However, the fission track registration technique is easier, less expensive and equally accurate compared to many other existing methods [1]. The determination of uranium content is of considerable interest to geologists, oceanographers, nuclear scientists and health physicists for various reasons, viz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%