2001
DOI: 10.2465/jmps.96.256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geobarometric constraints on the depth of emplacement of granite from the Ladakh batholith, Northwest Himalaya, India.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cations were initially calculated on the basis of 23 oxygens and then recalculated to account for ferric iron. The measured amphibole compositional data are in excellent agreement with published data (Jowhar, 2001;Singh et al, 2007) (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Mineral Analysessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Cations were initially calculated on the basis of 23 oxygens and then recalculated to account for ferric iron. The measured amphibole compositional data are in excellent agreement with published data (Jowhar, 2001;Singh et al, 2007) (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Mineral Analysessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The recalculated pressure and depth calculations from the studies of Jowhar, (2001) and Singh et al (2007) vary from those previously published due to the temperature effect and the fact that Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ are calculated by charge balance and normalised amphibole composition to 13 cations. Samples with Na+Ca (M4) < 2.0±0.1 were not considered further due to potential alteration, this included LB17 (Singh et al, 2007).…”
Section: Geobarometry and Depth Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conventional geothermobarometry (inverse modeling) uses the equilibrium thermodynamics of balanced chemical reactions between end-members of minerals, combined with the observed compositions of minerals [5] [6] [7]. Whereas in contrast, pseudosections involve a forward calculation of mineral equilibria for a given rock composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%