1977
DOI: 10.3133/ofr77821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical and mineralogical studies of a South Texas roll-front uranium deposit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the reduction mechanism may differ among the different roll front deposits. The Smith Ranch aquifers contain abundant fragments of organic carbon, a potential abiotic reductant, 35 while the south Texas U deposits are thought to form as a result of H 2 S gas incursion from stratigraphically lower hydrocarbon reservoirs 46,58,59 and the south Australian deposits may be a mixture of these reducing materials. 12 Chemically reducing conditions between the ore zone and down-gradient monitoring wells in MU4a are also evident from the concentration and isotopic composition of sulfate.…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the reduction mechanism may differ among the different roll front deposits. The Smith Ranch aquifers contain abundant fragments of organic carbon, a potential abiotic reductant, 35 while the south Texas U deposits are thought to form as a result of H 2 S gas incursion from stratigraphically lower hydrocarbon reservoirs 46,58,59 and the south Australian deposits may be a mixture of these reducing materials. 12 Chemically reducing conditions between the ore zone and down-gradient monitoring wells in MU4a are also evident from the concentration and isotopic composition of sulfate.…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some uranium deposits in the United Sates lack considerable organic matter. In some south Texas uranium deposits, organic carbon is less than 0.1 percent (Goldhaber and Reynolds, 1977). These deposits are generally low grade (<500 ppm) and the genesis of uranium deposits in this case can be explained by migration of H 2 S seeping up along faults (Goldhaber et al, 1979).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…1). The geologic setting, mineralogy, geochemistry, and genesis of the Benavides deposit have been discussed previously (Goldhaber and Reynolds, 1977;Reynolds and Goldhaber, 1978;Goldhaber and others, 1978;and Granger and Warren, 1974). Similar aspects of the Lamprecht deposit were described by Goldhaber and others (1979), and Daniels and others (1977).…”
Section: Description Of Depositsmentioning
confidence: 95%