2011
DOI: 10.2478/v10002-011-0002-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical background - an environmental perspective

Abstract: This article presents the concept of geochemical background from an environmental perspective. The idea of establishing the typical concentrations of elements in various environmental compartments, proposed by exploratory geochemists almost 50 years ago was important for the detection of anomalous element concentrations, thus providing a basic tool in the search for new mineral deposits. At present, the knowledge of the geochemical background of hazardous elements is essential for: defining pollution, identify… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geochemical background is commonly defined as a natural concentration range of a substance in a specific environmental compartment (Matschullat et al 2000;Gałuszka 2007;Gałuszka and Migaszewski 2011). This term, originally introduced into geochemistry for discrimination between non-anomalous element concentrations and geochemical anomalies (Hawkes and Webb 1962), was adapted to environmental sciences for differentiation between natural and contaminated sites (Förstner and Müller 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geochemical background is commonly defined as a natural concentration range of a substance in a specific environmental compartment (Matschullat et al 2000;Gałuszka 2007;Gałuszka and Migaszewski 2011). This term, originally introduced into geochemistry for discrimination between non-anomalous element concentrations and geochemical anomalies (Hawkes and Webb 1962), was adapted to environmental sciences for differentiation between natural and contaminated sites (Förstner and Müller 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2000, many authors have discussed the issues related to geochemical background and have proposed different methods of its evaluation (Matschullat et al 2000;Li et al 2003;Gałuszka 2006Gałuszka , 2007Gałuszka and Migaszewski 2011;Gustavsson et al 2012;Rékási and Filep 2012). However, only very few publications have considered geochemical background of metals in soils of post-mining sites (Loredo et al 2006;Teršič et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the above drawbacks, this method is advantageous in the sense that 120 the results represent actual data and are not subject to any processing. On the other hand, the 121 sampling of pristine areas is accompanied by the uncertainty of whether they are indeed free of 122 anthropogenic pollution (Galuzska and Migaszewski, 2011). 123…”
Section: Introduction 30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, demonstrated that the 102 median ± two times the median of the absolute deviations (median±2·MAD) is a more 103 appropriate estimator, even for normal populations. 104 The use of direct methods is criticized for various reasons: sampling of deep sediment is considered 111 technically difficult and expensive (Carral et al, 1995); it requires expert knowledge of the sampling 112 area and about the geochemical behaviour of the investigated elements, and there may be 113 subjectivity in selecting samples (Matschullat et al, 2000;Galuzska and Migaszewski, 2011). 114…”
Section: Introduction 30mentioning
confidence: 99%