“…Most authors (Ahmadzadeh, Jahangiri, Lentz, & Mojtahedi, 2010; Amel & Akbarzadeh Laleh, 2017; Amel et al, 2009; Amel, Moayyed, Ameri, Abedini, & Moazzen, 2008; Biabangard, Shahraki, & Boomari, 2015; Fahim Guilany, Darvishzadeh, Sheikhzakariaee, & VosoughiAbedini, 2019; Jalili, Amel, Hajaliogli, & Moayyed, 2015; Khezerlou, Amel, Gregoire, Moayyed, & Jahangiri, 2017; Khodami, Noghreyan, & Davoudian, 2009; Khosroshahi, 2015; Mahmoudi & Khajehei, 2019; Mojarrad & Souri, 2019; Noghreyan, Khodami, Davoudian, & Shabanian, 2011; Pirmohammadi et al, 2011; Pirooj, Jahangiri, Amel, & Kamali, 2014; Salehi, Torkian, & Furman, 2019; ShahbaziShiran & Shafaei Moghadam, 2014; Sherafat, Yavuz, Noorbehesht, & Yýldýrým, 2012) used the total alkalis vs. silica (TAS) classification diagram, but, in none of the papers, the rock classification was achieved by strictly following the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) recommendations (Le Bas, 2000; Le Bas, Le Maitre, Streckeisen, & Zanettin, 1986; Le Maitre et al, 2002). According to the IUGS, unless both Fe oxidation varieties were measured, the total Fe must first be split into FeO and Fe 2 O 3 and then all major oxides be adjusted to sum up to 100% on an anhydrous basis, which can be easily achieved through a suitable computer program, such as IgRoCS (Verma & Rivera‐Gómez, 2013).…”