2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical modelling for predicting the long-term performance of zeolite-PRB to treat lead contaminated groundwater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the breakpoint, a rapid increase of effluent concentration was monitored and the material was completely exhausted at 2200 PV (Figure 20). This value was tenfold higher than that reached in other works, in which zeolite was used as the reactive material and operating conditions comparable to those of the present study were applied [41]. Therefore, the experimental findings prove the high longevity of the synthesized material.…”
Section: Continuous Testssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…After the breakpoint, a rapid increase of effluent concentration was monitored and the material was completely exhausted at 2200 PV (Figure 20). This value was tenfold higher than that reached in other works, in which zeolite was used as the reactive material and operating conditions comparable to those of the present study were applied [41]. Therefore, the experimental findings prove the high longevity of the synthesized material.…”
Section: Continuous Testssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…PRBs generally contain reactive materials that remove contaminants through biological, physical and/or chemical processes, as the contaminants remain inside the reactive materials. [6][7][8] Vanadium(V) cannot be removed effectively by commercial activated carbon (AC), which is the most commonly used reactive material, because of its low adsorption capacity, narrow optimum pH range, and low adaptability to wide-ranging vanadium(V) wastewaters. In previous studies, ZnCl 2 activated carbon, 9 protonated chitosan akes, 10 metal (hydr)oxide adsorbents,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a mixed vanadium iron oxide compound (Zn 3 (OH) 2 V 2 O 7 $2H 2 O) resulting from the coprecipitation of vanadium(V) and Zn(II) was also observed by XRD pattern (Zn-BC + V). The reactions between vanadium(V) and Zn(II) can be described by eqn (6) and (7). Therefore, the adsorption mechanism of Zn-BC was surface precipitation and electrostatic attraction (as shown in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best performances were exhibited by natural zeolites (95% of transition metals ions removed in about 10 h). In other words, the zeolite that shows the highest ion exchange capacity is the one that exhibits the highest percentage of removal for that ion [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ]. Specifically, against the Cu, natural zeolites (especially mordenite) and cabuya fibers presented the largest removal percentages, while the calcareous limestone showed lower adsorption percentages even if still high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%