2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical provenancing and direct dating of the Harbin archaic human cranium

Abstract: Unsystematic recovery of the Harbin fossil cranium and a long history since the discovery impede its accurate dating -Geochemical analyses, including non-destructive X-ray fluorescence, rare earth elements, and the strontium isotopes, suggest that the fossil cranium was from a bed of lacustrine sediments aged between 138 and 309 thousand years ago in the Harbin region -Uranium-series disequilibrium dating directly on the cranium suggests that the cranium is older than 146 thousand years ll www.cell.com/the-inn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggest a minimum age for the cranium of 146 ka. 10 While these results cannot pin the Harbin cranium to an exact site and layer, they are consistent with the conclusion that the cranium is from the late Middle Pleistocene of the Harbin area. 10…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results suggest a minimum age for the cranium of 146 ka. 10 While these results cannot pin the Harbin cranium to an exact site and layer, they are consistent with the conclusion that the cranium is from the late Middle Pleistocene of the Harbin area. 10…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The results of our experiments show that element distributions and REE concentrations of the Harbin cranium and the mammalian fossils found near Dongjiang Bridge have similar distribution patterns. 10 The Sr isotopic composition of the Harbin cranium falls in the range of the local Middle Pleistocene-Early Holocene human and mammalian fossils. 10 We also directly dated the Harbin fossil cranium by the uranium-series disequilibrium (U-series) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…H. antecessor is much smaller than the Harbin cranium, with weaker supraorbital development, much smaller endocranial volume, narrower upper face width, and much smaller M. 2 Differing from the Dali cranium, Harbin lacks sagittal keeling and presents proportionally larger and almost square orbits, overall thinner and smoother supraorbital tori with a weaker superciliary arch, and weaker lateral thinning. The Jinniushan cranium has a similar cranial capacity (1,390 ml) to the Harbin, but is more gracile.…”
Section: Comparative Morphologymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Ni Xijun named a new taxa Homo longi by a fossil skull found in Haerbin (Fig. 6 l) [Ji et al, 2021;Shao et al, 2021;Ni et al, 2021], and he proposed a hypothesis of multi-directional "shuttle dispersal model" for the evolution of Homo by phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses, which present the Jinjiushan, Hualongdong, Dali, Xiahe, and Homo Longi belong to a monophyletic group and have been separated with Homo sapiens around 948.73ka. Liu Wu propose that, it may be a proper way to treat the late Middle Pleistocene hominin fossils with combined or mosaic morphological features as uncleared taxa before totally understand their morphological diversities [Liu, Wu, 2022].…”
Section: Middle Pleistocenementioning
confidence: 99%