1996
DOI: 10.1080/00206819709465380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry and Genesis of the S-Type, Cordierite-Andalusite-Bearing Capillitas Batholith, Argentina

Abstract: The Ordovician Famatinian-age magmatic cordierite-andalusite-bearing Capillitas batholith, in the Pampean Ranges of northwestern Argentina, encompasses a coarsely porphyritic to equigranular two-mica monzogranite with equigranular, fine-grained, late leucogranitic muscovite-rich facies. This batholith exhibits sharp, discordant contacts with low-pressure biotiteandalusite-cordierite schists of the La Cébila Formation, locally developing biotite-cordieritemuscovite-bearing contact hornfels aureoles.The two-mica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magmatic activity in the study area and nearby ranges can be enclosed in two major events: LowerMiddle Ordovician (Famatinian) and Late Devonian -Early Carboniferous (Achalian). The former and more important is characterized by the Capillitas Batholith, the main granitoid body that crops out in the area and is representative of the Ordovician peraluminous S-type Famatinian magmatism (Toselli et al, 1996;Pankhurst et al, 2000;Rossi et al, 2002). In addition, several coeval I-type and S-type plutons complete the Ordovician magmatic groups (Knüver, 1983;Toselli, 1992;Rapela et al, 2005;Büttner et al, 2005).…”
Section: Geologic Setting Of Northern Sierras Pampeanasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magmatic activity in the study area and nearby ranges can be enclosed in two major events: LowerMiddle Ordovician (Famatinian) and Late Devonian -Early Carboniferous (Achalian). The former and more important is characterized by the Capillitas Batholith, the main granitoid body that crops out in the area and is representative of the Ordovician peraluminous S-type Famatinian magmatism (Toselli et al, 1996;Pankhurst et al, 2000;Rossi et al, 2002). In addition, several coeval I-type and S-type plutons complete the Ordovician magmatic groups (Knüver, 1983;Toselli, 1992;Rapela et al, 2005;Büttner et al, 2005).…”
Section: Geologic Setting Of Northern Sierras Pampeanasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metamorphic basement in mainly formed by the Ancasti Formation, with sedimentation ages between 680 and 570 Ma (Rapela et al, 2007;Murra et al, 2011) and a metamorphic episode between ~477 and 470 Ma (UePb geochronology on monazite grains, Larrovere et al, 2011). The igneous activity is Middle to Late Ordovician (Knüver, 1983;Toselli, 1992;Toselli et al, 1996;Pankhurst et al, 2000;Rossi et al, 2002;Rapela et al, 2005) and Devonian-early Carboniferous (Knüver, 1983;Toselli, 1983;Indri and Barber, 1987;Toselli, 1992) (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accretionary wedge zone is located in the west side of the Sierra de Valle Fértil and consists of metamorphic rocks with strong isothermal decompression paths (Vujovich 1994;Baldo et al 2001;Otamendi et al 2008;Casquet et al 2012). The arc zone consists of calc-alkaline batholiths composed of I-, S-and transitional I/S-type granitoids with εNd 470 values of ~−4 to −5.5, ~−4.5 to −8.5 and ~−4 to −6, respectively (Toselli et al 1996;Pankhurst et al 1998;Saavedra et al 1998;Dahlquist and Galindo 2004;Grosse et al 2011). In the westernmost region of the Famatinian arc, mafic magmatism with a wide isotopic range (εNd 470 ~−5.5 to 4.5) has been reported as well as granulite facies migmatites (Pankhurst et al 2000;Otamendi et al 2008Otamendi et al , 2009Otamendi et al , 2010Casquet et al 2012).…”
Section: The Famatinian Beltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the retro-arc zone to the east, minor isolated granitoid plutons that intruded into metasedimentary host rocks represent the innermost documentation of the Famatinian magmatism (Toselli et al 1983;Llambías et al 1998;Pankhurst et al 2000;Dahlquist et al 2012). A plethora of geochemical, isotopic and geochronologic studies (Knüver 1983;Reissinger 1983;Toselli et al 1983Toselli et al , 1996Rapela et al 1990;Toselli 1992;Llambías et al 1998;Pankhurst et al 1998Pankhurst et al , 2000Saavedra et al 1998;Rossi et al 2002;Sato et al 2003;Cisterna 2003;Cisterna et al 2004;Dahlquist and Galindo 2004;Büttner et al 2005;Dahlquist et al 2005Dahlquist et al , 2007Dahlquist et al , 2008Dahlquist et al , 2012Dahlquist et al , 2013López de Luchi et al 2007;Fernández et al 2008;Morosini et al 2009;Otamendi et al 2009Otamendi et al , 2012Ducea et al 2010;Chernicoff et al 2010;Sola and Becchio 2010;Grosse et al 2011;Steenken et al 2011;Casquet et al 2012) attempted to unravel the origin and geotectonic evolution of the Famatinian magmatism. The core works focus on the regional evolution of granitic batholiths from the main Famatinian magmatic arc (Sierras de Capillitas, Velasco, Chepes, Famatina and Valle Fértil), whereas less attention was given to the more...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%