1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001260050156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry and mineralization age of magnesian skarn-type iron deposits of the Janggun mine, Republic of Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, purely ultramafic magmatic genesis can easily be discounted on the basis of the very negative and varied Mg isotopic compositions of the Zhaoanzhuang iron deposit ( Table 2 and Table S1), which is inconsistent with the limited Mg isotopic fractionation produced during partial melting and crystal fractionation [47,[59][60][61]. Despite the fact that these isotopic compositions do not entirely discount the possibility of intrusion-associated magnesian skarn-type deposits hosted in dolomitic carbonate rocks, based on the limited outcrops and the analyzed samples, we believe that magmatic skarn mineralization should be excluded as a possibility due to the following arguments: (1) There is no significant enrichment of any other base metal, which is common in other intrusion-associated skarn deposits [171,180,181]. (2) There is no alteration zonation, which is common in skarn mineralization systems when magma intrudes the wall rock.…”
Section: Implications For Provenance and Metallogenic Processesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, purely ultramafic magmatic genesis can easily be discounted on the basis of the very negative and varied Mg isotopic compositions of the Zhaoanzhuang iron deposit ( Table 2 and Table S1), which is inconsistent with the limited Mg isotopic fractionation produced during partial melting and crystal fractionation [47,[59][60][61]. Despite the fact that these isotopic compositions do not entirely discount the possibility of intrusion-associated magnesian skarn-type deposits hosted in dolomitic carbonate rocks, based on the limited outcrops and the analyzed samples, we believe that magmatic skarn mineralization should be excluded as a possibility due to the following arguments: (1) There is no significant enrichment of any other base metal, which is common in other intrusion-associated skarn deposits [171,180,181]. (2) There is no alteration zonation, which is common in skarn mineralization systems when magma intrudes the wall rock.…”
Section: Implications For Provenance and Metallogenic Processesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Examples of this type of skarn include the Galinge iron-bearing magnesian skarn zone in the Qiman Tagh metallogenic belt, western Tianshan, China, which formed through the interaction between granodiorite and dolomitic marble [170], and the Janggun magnesian skarn-type iron deposits, Republic of Korea, which developed in the Cambrian dolomitized Janggun Limestone along its contact with the Jurassic Chunyang granite [171]. The gangue minerals in the ores mainly include Mg-rich forsterite, serpentine, chondrodite, clinochlore, talc, phlogopite, dipside, and carbonate minerals (dolomite, magnesite, and calcite), while the ore minerals include magnetite, hematite, pyrrhotite, and various other sulfides [171]. Chemical sedimentogenic Mg-Fe deposits were most commonly formed in the Precambrian and underwent various levels of late metamorphic or hydrothermal processes.…”
Section: Implications For Provenance and Metallogenic Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lens-and pipe-shaped orebodies are hosted in the Janggun limestone Formation of the Joseon Supergroup which was structurally controlled by the Jurassic Chunyang granite (148.5 Ma). The K-Ar ages of sericite from Zn-Pb ore yielded 70.0-73.6 Ma (Lee et al, 1996).…”
Section: Janggunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…+10.5‰) (Lee and Park, 1996), and Janggun-B Pb-Zn (av. +6.5‰) (Lee et al, 1998b) are typically associated with carbonate rocks in the Taebaeksan basin and the Yeongnam massif. The highest δ 34 S value may be attributed to the reactions of hydrothermal fluids with carbonate rocks containing 34 S-enriched marine sulfur (McCuaig and Kerrich, 1998).…”
Section: Sulfur Isotope Variance Of Metallic Deposits By Deposit Typementioning
confidence: 99%