2002
DOI: 10.1086/341759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry and Tectonic Setting of the Ophiolitic Ingalls Complex, North Cascades, Washington: Implications for Correlations of Jurassic Cordilleran Ophiolites

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Geology. A B S T R A C TThis study synthesizes new and ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shallowest level of the crustal section is represented by the Jurassic Ingalls ophiolite complex. It consists of Early Jurassic within-plate basalts and a more voluminous Late Jurassic supra-subduction-zone ophiolite deformed in an oceanic fracture zone represented in part by steeply dipping serpentinitematrix mélange (Miller, 1985;Metzger et al, 2002;MacDonald et al, 2008). The ophiolite is dominated by ultramafic mantle tectonites, has a thin crustal mafic intrusive and volcanic section, and is overlain by mainly mudstone and chert (Miller, 1985;Miller and Mogk, 1987;MacDonald et al, 2008).…”
Section: Host Rock Framework Of Crustal Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shallowest level of the crustal section is represented by the Jurassic Ingalls ophiolite complex. It consists of Early Jurassic within-plate basalts and a more voluminous Late Jurassic supra-subduction-zone ophiolite deformed in an oceanic fracture zone represented in part by steeply dipping serpentinitematrix mélange (Miller, 1985;Metzger et al, 2002;MacDonald et al, 2008). The ophiolite is dominated by ultramafic mantle tectonites, has a thin crustal mafic intrusive and volcanic section, and is overlain by mainly mudstone and chert (Miller, 1985;Miller and Mogk, 1987;MacDonald et al, 2008).…”
Section: Host Rock Framework Of Crustal Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the Izu-OgasawaraMariana fore-arc (Ishii et al, 1992), Mariana back-arc-basin (Ohara et al, 2002), South Sandwich arc-basin system (Pearce et al, 2000), Izu-Bonin-Mariana fore-arc (Parkinson and Pearce, 1998), Yarlung Zangbo ophiolites (Dubois-Coté et al, 2005), Ingalls ophiolitic complex (Metzger et al, 2002) and Oman ophiolites (Tamura and Arai, 2006), all of which suggest depleted residues after partial melting of the upper mantle such as type 1 and type 2 peridotites in the Eastern Khoy Ophiolitic Complex.…”
Section: Petrogenesis Of the Mantle Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B), which has been interpreted to represent a Late Jurassic ophiolite complex (e.g., Southwick, 1974;Metzger et al 2002). The Ingalls complex includes peridotites, serpentinites, gabbros, and various metasedimentary rocks, which were juxtaposed along numerous Late Jurassic faults in or adjacent to a fracture zone within a large ocean or marginal basin (Miller and Mogk, 1987).…”
Section: Mount Stuart Batholith (Msb) Washingtonmentioning
confidence: 99%