1985
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2541(85)90120-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry of eclogites and associated rocks of the southeastern area of the French Massif Central: Origin of the protoliths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By combining the results of whole-rock based major and trace element geotectonic diagrams with the zircon trace element provenance diagrams, all results suggest a crustal contamination (Fig. 2) and are in agreement with previous studies that suggested emplacement in a thinned continental crust in a spreading environment (e.g., Briand & Piboule, 1985;Briand et al, 1988;Bouchardon et al, 1989).…”
Section: Eclogite Protoliths: Origin and Emplacement Settingsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By combining the results of whole-rock based major and trace element geotectonic diagrams with the zircon trace element provenance diagrams, all results suggest a crustal contamination (Fig. 2) and are in agreement with previous studies that suggested emplacement in a thinned continental crust in a spreading environment (e.g., Briand & Piboule, 1985;Briand et al, 1988;Bouchardon et al, 1989).…”
Section: Eclogite Protoliths: Origin and Emplacement Settingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the Variscan belt, the timing of the HP metamorphism and the subsequent exhumation of the subducted rocks is controversial. The convergence between two megacontinents, Laurussia to the north and Gondwana to the south, with the contribution of microplates, such as Armorica or Avalonia (e.g., Murphy et al, 2009;Kroner & Romer, http://www.petrology.oupjournals.org/ 6 Briand (1985) interpreted the LAC as a tholeiitic suite from a shallow crustal origin in a spreading environment; (iv) Pin & Piboule (1988) proposed a collision between two independent magmatic suites to account for the composite character of the LAC; (v) for Briand et al (1988), the magmatic signature of the LAC corresponds to an emplacement in a back-arc basin environment; and (vi) Lardeaux (2014) finally reinterpreted the chemical composition of all the LAC occurrences from the FMC, including the LAC from the Lévézou, as reflecting a hyper-extended continental margin. However, all these authors agree on the fact that the LAC does not correspond to a metamorphosed mature oceanic crust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view has been profoundly modified first by the results of absolute dating demonstrating ubiquitous Variscan reworking (Gebauer et al, 1981;Pin and Lancelot, 1982;Rolin et al, 1982;Duthou et al, 1994). Another turning point was to interpret the felsic/mafic gneisses with a tholeiitic signature, defined as the Leptynite-Amphibolite Complex (LAC), as remnants of ophiolites (Forestier, 1961;Briand and Piboule, 1979;Cabanis et al, 1983;Maillet et al, 1984;Mercier et al, 1985;Piboule and Briand, 1985;Briand et al, 1988;Dubuisson et al, 1989;Pin, 1990). In the Armorican Massif, ophiolites define the Medio-European suture also referred to as the Galicia-South Brittany suture, or the Eo-Variscan suture (Bernard-Griffiths and Cornichet, 1985;Hanmer, 1977;Faure et al, 1997;Ballèvre et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…thesis, Univ. Lyon, 1979;Piboule & Briand, 1985;Gardien, 1993) and felsic gneiss lenses closely associated with the metabasites.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 95%