1996
DOI: 10.3133/wri964107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry of ground water in the Gulf Coast Aquifer systems, south-central United States

Abstract: Median value of selected chemical constituents and properties of water, median sampling depth, water types, and number of analyses for each subarea of permeable zone C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the southern extent of the study area has highly saline groundwater at depth that precluded groundwater-flow modeling for Tertiary units in Clark and Hart (2009). The effects of this wedge of saline water can be observed in the prediction maps for the MCAQ and LCAQ where Cl is highest near the southern boundary of the active model cells ( Figure 8); concentrations in the inactive cells are generally greater than 10,000 mg/L TDS (not shown in Figure 7) owing to dissolution of halite in salt domes (Pettijohn 1996). SC model predictions were more accurate (higher r 2 and lower RMSE) than for Cl.…”
Section: Important Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the southern extent of the study area has highly saline groundwater at depth that precluded groundwater-flow modeling for Tertiary units in Clark and Hart (2009). The effects of this wedge of saline water can be observed in the prediction maps for the MCAQ and LCAQ where Cl is highest near the southern boundary of the active model cells ( Figure 8); concentrations in the inactive cells are generally greater than 10,000 mg/L TDS (not shown in Figure 7) owing to dissolution of halite in salt domes (Pettijohn 1996). SC model predictions were more accurate (higher r 2 and lower RMSE) than for Cl.…”
Section: Important Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the partial dependence plots for ageMin between SC and Cl (Figure S5), with some high Cl concentrations where young water is present, but SC is low, likely reflects the anthropogenic contribution of Cl. Areas of higher salinity in the MRVA have been hypothesized to be controlled by (1) deeper sources of salinity (whether saline groundwater from dissolution of salt domes or connate seawater) moving upward from underlying aquifers (e.g., along faults, wells, or where confining units are thin or absent) or (2) accumulation of salts during evaporation when recharge is slowed by surficial clays (Pettijohn 1996;Kresse and Clark 2008;Paul et al 2018). Because of the physiography of the alluvial plain footprint, many surficial explanatory variables (especially soils and land use) strongly reflect that footprint.…”
Section: Important Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%