2007
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20071004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemistry of Surface and Ground Water in Cement Creek from Gladstone to Georgia Gulch and in Prospect Gulch, San Juan County, Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A correlation between apparent tracer age and EA has been observed in other mountain settings [ Plummer et al , 2001; Manning et al , 2003, Figure 4b]. Figure 11 shows modeled EA (expressed as ΔNe) plotted versus apparent 3 H/ 3 He ages for the previously described alpine groundwater samples presented by Johnson et al [2007]. Samples with low sampling pressures (<1 m) and samples with higher sampling pressures (>2 m) are plotted separately because gas loss is a concern, as at Handcart Gulch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A correlation between apparent tracer age and EA has been observed in other mountain settings [ Plummer et al , 2001; Manning et al , 2003, Figure 4b]. Figure 11 shows modeled EA (expressed as ΔNe) plotted versus apparent 3 H/ 3 He ages for the previously described alpine groundwater samples presented by Johnson et al [2007]. Samples with low sampling pressures (<1 m) and samples with higher sampling pressures (>2 m) are plotted separately because gas loss is a concern, as at Handcart Gulch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, these data have generally been collected from (1) springs, which probably cannot preserve high EA concentrations; (2) shallow alluvial wells, which may not intercept bedrock waters; or (3) environments that are mountainous but not alpine. Dissolved gas data presented by Johnson et al [2007] are an important exception. These data were collected from Prospect Gulch, an alpine watershed in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado at elevations >3100 m asl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the pH downstream of the plant at the outlet of Cement Creek remains low (∼3 < pH < ∼4.5), which is likely a result of several other draining mines such as the Mogul Mine or Red and Bonita Mine ( Figure 1C) that contribute low pH and metal-rich water to Cement Creek and do not undergo treatment (USGS, 2020). Historic data show dissolved aluminum, copper, and zinc concentrations as high as ∼18,500, 285, and 7,280 µg/L, respectively, in Cement Creek downstream of the Prospect Gulch inflow (Johnson et al, 2007). Recently, the Bonita Peak Mining District Superfund identified the Henrietta Mine as a priority contamination source as a result of elevated aqueous concentrations of Al, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn and high sediment-As concentrations (USEPA, 2017).…”
Section: Hydrogeologic Setting and Site Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four samples of stream chemistry and streamflow were compiled from recent US EPA reports (USEPA, 2016, 2017) for MC-Fen. For the CC-PG reach, a total of 10 geochemical samples and corresponding streamflow measurements were compiled from Johnson et al (2007) and one from a US EPA report (site no. CC27) (USEPA, 2017).…”
Section: Compilation Of Historic Data and Cq Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%