Geochemical Treasures and Petrogenetic Processes 2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-4782-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemometrics: Petrology of Quaternary Volcanism in the Central Mexican Volcanic Belt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Márquez and De Ignacio (2002) and Aguirre‐Espinosa et al. (2022) geochemical studies suggest that the crust base beneath Sierra Chichinautzin may have been formed by underplating of mafic magmas, supporting our hypothesis. Consequently, we propose that underplating beneath Sierra Chichinautzin and Sierra de las Cruces may explain the high‐velocity crust base anomaly, and it might be responsible for our differences in Moho estimation versus the Cruz‐Atienza et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, Márquez and De Ignacio (2002) and Aguirre‐Espinosa et al. (2022) geochemical studies suggest that the crust base beneath Sierra Chichinautzin may have been formed by underplating of mafic magmas, supporting our hypothesis. Consequently, we propose that underplating beneath Sierra Chichinautzin and Sierra de las Cruces may explain the high‐velocity crust base anomaly, and it might be responsible for our differences in Moho estimation versus the Cruz‐Atienza et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, the A-A*, D-D*, E-E*, F-F*, G-G*, H-H*, I-I*, J-J*, and M-M* profiles suggest that this behavior is also present beneath Sierra de las Cruces, where the high-velocity crust base anomaly can be found around 34 km. Additionally, Márquez and De Ignacio (2002) and Aguirre-Espinosa et al (2022) geochemical studies suggest that the crust base beneath Sierra Chichinautzin may have been formed by underplating of mafic magmas, supporting our hypothesis. Consequently, we propose that underplating beneath Sierra Chichinautzin and Sierra de las Cruces may explain the high-velocity crust base anomaly, and it might be responsible for our differences in Moho estimation versus the Cruz-Atienza et al (2010) and Espíndola et al (2017) ones since, as discussed in Section 5.1, they may have averaged the effect of the underplated material and the mantle as a single layer.…”
Section: Rest Of the Crustal Structure And Its Complexitysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Additional investigations on specific mineral phases can include diffusion modelling and calculations of magma ascent rates, among other approaches. Finally, we encourage to further analyse the CatVolc database content with other multivariate techniques, such as principal component analysis or clustering, or applying geochemometrics, a geochemistry systematized branch resulting from the combination of geochemical principles with statistical, mathematical, and computational tools (e.g., Aguirre Espinosa et al, 2022). Such endeavours will contribute to a more comprehensive characterization of the magmatic system(s) and its dynamic processes.…”
Section: Future Volcanic-driven Studies At the Cvzmentioning
confidence: 99%