2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2022.107489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochronological evolution of the potentially active Iliniza Volcano (Ecuador) based on new K-Ar ages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of the Pleistocene andesitic volcanic centres developed during the last 0.5–0.6 Ma: later eruptive stages of Cayambe started from 0.4 Ma, of Rucu Pichincha from 0.45 Ma; Illiniza‐Santa Cruz from 0.7 Ma (Santamaría et al, 2022), Cotopaxi from c . 0.5 Ma (Hall & Mothes, 2008), Antisana at 0.4 Ma (Hall et al, 2017), Quilindaña and Chalupas at 0.2 Ma (Bablon et al, 2020b), Cotacachi at 0.2 Ma (Bablon et al, 2020b), Carihuairazo successively at 0.5 and 0.2 Ma (Bablon et al, 2019), and Chimborazo at 0.1–0.15 Ma (Samaniego et al, 2012) [see Figure 2b for a graphical summary].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, most of the Pleistocene andesitic volcanic centres developed during the last 0.5–0.6 Ma: later eruptive stages of Cayambe started from 0.4 Ma, of Rucu Pichincha from 0.45 Ma; Illiniza‐Santa Cruz from 0.7 Ma (Santamaría et al, 2022), Cotopaxi from c . 0.5 Ma (Hall & Mothes, 2008), Antisana at 0.4 Ma (Hall et al, 2017), Quilindaña and Chalupas at 0.2 Ma (Bablon et al, 2020b), Cotacachi at 0.2 Ma (Bablon et al, 2020b), Carihuairazo successively at 0.5 and 0.2 Ma (Bablon et al, 2019), and Chimborazo at 0.1–0.15 Ma (Samaniego et al, 2012) [see Figure 2b for a graphical summary].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illiniza-Santa Cruz from 0.7 Ma (Santamaría et al, 2022), Cotopaxi from c. 0.5 Ma (Hall & Mothes, 2008), Antisana at 0.4 Ma (Hall et al, 2017), Quilindaña and Chalupas at 0.2 Ma (Bablon et al, 2020b),…”
Section: Phylogeny and Divergence Time Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some volcanoes, such as Tungurahua, Antisana, and the Pichincha complex, magmas became more silicic with time, but no clear changes can be linked to glacial cycles (Robin et al, 2010;Hall et al, 2017;Bablon et al, 2020). At Iliniza, the reverse is observed where magmas became less silicic and more magnesian with time, but changes are also not discussed in relation to changing ice coverage (Santamaría et al, 2022). In other cases, correlations between eruptive rate and compositions occur but they are not causally connected with time-varied ice coverage.…”
Section: Time-composition Trends For Arc Volcanoes Affected By Pleist...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Elevated edifice growth rates after ~15 ka, relative to the apparent hiatus between 190 ± 23 ka and ~15 ka, appear to show increased eruptive rates following deglaciation, but a similar pattern is not seen after the MIS 6 deglaciation (ending at ~130 ka). At Iliniza, the northern edifice was constructed at a rate of 3.5 ± 2.6 km 3 /kyr over the period of ~124-116 ka following the MIS 6 glacial termination (Santamaría et al, 2022). After a ~70 kyr-long apparent lacuna during MIS 5 and 4, construction of the South Iliniza edifice recommenced at ~46 ka and continued until ~25 ka (MIS 3-2), with no post-25 lava flows.…”
Section: Ecuadorian Andesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation