2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.09.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochronology and geochemistry of Late Ordovician–Early Devonian gneissic granites in the Kumishi area, northern margin of the South Tianshan Belt: Constraints on subduction process of the South Tianshan Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The closure of South Tianshan Ocean is also debated with four popular models as follows. (1) Northward subduction beneath the blocks of Kyrgyz Middle Tianshan‐Yili‐Chinese Central Tianshan (e.g., Y. G. Han et al, ; Xiao et al, ), (2) southward subduction beneath the Palaeozoic Tarim (e.g., Alexeiev et al, ; Charvet et al, ; Lin et al, ; B. Wang et al, ), (3) bidirectional subduction (e.g., Chen et al, ; Ge et al, ), and (4) bidirectional subduction during Early Palaeozoic times followed by northward consumption during the Late Palaeozoic (e.g., H. Huang et al, ; Jiang et al, ). Furthermore, the timing of the final closure of South Tianshan Ocean and amalgamation of Palaeozoic Tarim with the SW CAOB also remain controversial with suggestions varying from Late Devonian to Early Triassic (reviewed in B. F. Han et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The closure of South Tianshan Ocean is also debated with four popular models as follows. (1) Northward subduction beneath the blocks of Kyrgyz Middle Tianshan‐Yili‐Chinese Central Tianshan (e.g., Y. G. Han et al, ; Xiao et al, ), (2) southward subduction beneath the Palaeozoic Tarim (e.g., Alexeiev et al, ; Charvet et al, ; Lin et al, ; B. Wang et al, ), (3) bidirectional subduction (e.g., Chen et al, ; Ge et al, ), and (4) bidirectional subduction during Early Palaeozoic times followed by northward consumption during the Late Palaeozoic (e.g., H. Huang et al, ; Jiang et al, ). Furthermore, the timing of the final closure of South Tianshan Ocean and amalgamation of Palaeozoic Tarim with the SW CAOB also remain controversial with suggestions varying from Late Devonian to Early Triassic (reviewed in B. F. Han et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closure of South Tianshan Ocean is also debated with four popular models as follows. (1) Northward subduction beneath the blocks of Kyrgyz Middle Tianshan-Yili-Chinese Central Tianshan (e.g., Y. G. Han et al, 2015;Xiao et al, 2013), (2) southward subduction beneath the Palaeozoic Tarim (e.g., Alexeiev et al, 2015;Charvet et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2013;, (3) bidirectional subduction (e.g., Chen et al, 2015;Ge et al, 2012), and (4) bidirectional subduction during Early Palaeozoic times followed by northward consumption during the Late Palaeozoic (e.g., H. Huang et al, 2013;Jiang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geologically, the Tianshan Belt is divided into three tectonic units: north, central, and south Tianshan (Gao et al, ; Gao, Long, et al, ). However, there is often confusion in correlating the subunits of Chinese Tianshan with the corresponding units in the Kazakh and Kyrgyz Tien Shan (B. Chen et al, ; Kröner et al, ; Ma, Shu, Jahn, Zhu, & Faure, ; Rojas‐Agramonte et al, ; Shu et al, ; Wang, Shu, et al, ). Geographically, the Tianshan Range is separated into southern and northern parts by the Mesozoic‐Cenozoic Kazakh‐Yili, and Tu‐Ha basins (Wang et al, ; Wang, Faure, et al, ).…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model is supported by distribution of Palaeozoic arc magmatism (Dong et al, ; Long et al, ; Z. P. Ma et al, ), development of south‐vergent fold‐and‐thrust system (Xiao et al, ), and a widespread Palaeozoic sedimentary succession (Gao et al, ). (b) A southward subduction model (e.g., Charvet et al, ; B. Chen et al, ; Loury et al, ; Wang et al, ). This is supported by arc‐type magmatic rocks in the STOB (Guo et al, ; Lin et al, ; Zhong et al, ; Z. X. Zhu et al, ) and top‐to‐the‐north ductile deformation in metamorphic rocks and ophiolitic mélanges (Charvet et al, ; Lin et al, ; Wang et al, ).…”
Section: Implications For the Tectonic Evolution Of The Stobmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation