2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2013.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochronology and geochemistry of volcanic rocks from the Shaojiwa Formation and Xingzi Group, Lushan area, SE China: Implications for Neoproterozoic back-arc basin in the Yangtze Block

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(127 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These rocks plot in a field near bulk silicate Earth (BSE) in initial Nd vs. 87 Sr/ 86 Sr diagram (Zindler and Hart, 1986) (Fig. 4), indicating they were probably derived from a subcontinental lithospheric mantle and/or a mantle metasomatized by subducted sediments (Li et al, 2013).…”
Section: Sr-nd Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These rocks plot in a field near bulk silicate Earth (BSE) in initial Nd vs. 87 Sr/ 86 Sr diagram (Zindler and Hart, 1986) (Fig. 4), indicating they were probably derived from a subcontinental lithospheric mantle and/or a mantle metasomatized by subducted sediments (Li et al, 2013).…”
Section: Sr-nd Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rocks were derived from a subcontinental lithospheric mantle source and/or a mantle metasomatized by subducted sediments (Li et al, 2013) above a subducting slab. The rocks are represented by high Zr values in Y vs. Zr diagram (Sun and McDonough, 1989) (Fig.…”
Section: Magma Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The South China Block was formed through amalgamation of the Yangtze and Cathaysia Blocks during the Proterozoic (Guo et al 1980;Zhou and Zhu 1993;Charvet et al 1996;Greentree et al 2006;Ye et al 2007;Li et al 2009bLi et al , 2011Li et al , 2013aLi et al , 2013b, and the JiangshanShaoxing-Pingxiang Fault is considered to be the major suture zone between the two blocks ( Figure 1) Wong et al 2011). An alternative interpretation is that it was formed through accretion of multiple terranes and is thus an accretionary orogen (e.g.…”
Section: Geological Setting and Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned earlier, it is widely accepted that the South China Block formed through amalgamation of the Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks in Neoproterozoic time ('Jinningian movement', Charvet et al 1996;Wang et al 2007aWang et al , 2008Zhou et al 2009;Li et al 2009bLi et al , 2011Li et al , 2013aLi et al , 2013b and was influenced by several later tectonic events including the Late Ordovician-Silurian ('Caledonian', Shu et al 1991;Ren 1991;Shu 2006;Wang et al 2007b), late Permian-Triassic ('Indosinian', Chen 1999;Wang et al 2002Wang et al , 2005, and middle Mesozoic ('Yanshanian', Zhou and Li 2000;Li et al 2009a) tectonothermal events. Until the Late Cretaceous, southeastern China was marked by extensive subduction-related volcanism coupled with intrusions of syntactic granitoids (Jahn et al 1990;BGMRFJ 1996;Li et al 2009a).…”
Section: Implications For Tectonic Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…827-819 Ma Fuchuan ophiolites (Zhang et al, 2012a(Zhang et al, ,b, 2013a; NE Jiangxi ophiolites; ca. 970-890 Ma Shuangxiwu volcanic rocks (Li et al, 2009) 2012a; Wang et al, 2006Wang et al, , 2007Wang et al, , 2008Wang et al, , 2012Li et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2011Zhao et al, , 2013aYao et al, 2013Yao et al, , 2014Xu et al, 2014). For instance, recent new geochronological and geochemical data of the Fuchuan ophiolite suite indicate that the ophiolites formed during the ages of 827-819 Ma and exhibit typical features of suprasubduction zone (SSZ) type ophiolites Zhang et al, 2012aZhang et al, ,b, 2013a, which argues against the early Neoproterozoic (∼880-860 Ma) amalgamation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%