2016
DOI: 10.17850/njg95-3-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochronology of the Palaeoproterozoic Kautokeino Greenstone Belt, Finnmark, Norway: Tectonic implications in a Fennoscandia context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10I; Bingen et al, 2015). An Ar-Ar biotite plateau age of 1743 ± 4 Ma probably constrains the end of regional metamorphism in this area (Bingen et al, 2015), and is in agreement with a Re-Os age of molybdenite from the Cu-mineralised Middle Dolostone Member of the Gorahatjohka Formation at ~1765 Ma (Perelló et al, 2015).…”
Section: Tectonic Setting and Regional Correlationssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10I; Bingen et al, 2015). An Ar-Ar biotite plateau age of 1743 ± 4 Ma probably constrains the end of regional metamorphism in this area (Bingen et al, 2015), and is in agreement with a Re-Os age of molybdenite from the Cu-mineralised Middle Dolostone Member of the Gorahatjohka Formation at ~1765 Ma (Perelló et al, 2015).…”
Section: Tectonic Setting and Regional Correlationssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…These rocks could possibly represent correlatives of the Masi quartzites and the albite diabase sills in the Kautokeino Greenstone Belt ( Fig. 1A; Solli, 1983), the latter of which were emplaced at 2220 ± 7 Ma (Bingen et al, 2015). The Ulveryggen Formation and intrusions form the lowermost part of the proposed stratigraphy of the RTW, but their characteristics diverge significantly from those of the overlying succession, which instead point toward a convergent margin setting.…”
Section: Tectonic Setting and Regional Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The eastern and western borders of the belt are intruded by younger granites, granodiorites and diorites. This c. 50 km-wide, strongly sheared, greenstone belt (Olesen et al, 1990;Olesen & Sandstad, 1993;Henderson et al, 2015;Bingen et al, 2015) is dominated by mafic volcanic rocks but also includes two metasedimentary formations. Amphibolitised basaltic volcanites are the principal lithologies, both lavas and tuffs, also with Cross-cutting faults and also dykes are visible in the aeromagnetic data within the TB.…”
Section: Figure 8 (A) Tilt-derivative Of Magnetic Data (B) Ternary mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2; Siedlecka et al, 1985;Bingen et al, 2015). The Karasjok Greenstone Belt (KSGB), below the TB and east of the mainly tonalitic gneisses of the domal Jergol Gneiss Complex (JGC), consists of a thick volcanosedimentary succession divided into several formations with a total thickness in the range 7-10 km (Siedlecka et al, 1985;Midtun, 1988;Skaar, 2014).…”
Section: Figure 8 (A) Tilt-derivative Of Magnetic Data (B) Ternary mentioning
confidence: 99%