2013
DOI: 10.1080/00206814.2013.771949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochronology, petrogenesis, and tectonic setting of Mesozoic volcanic rocks, southern Manzhouli area, Inner Mongolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
34
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have examined the late Mesozoic volcanic rocks of the Great Xing'an Range over the past decade (Zhao et al 1989;Ge et al 1999Ge et al , 2000Ge et al , 2001Guo et al 2001;Fan et al 2003;Wang et al 2006;Xu et al 2008Xu et al , 2013aZhang et al 2008aZhang et al , 2010, and these studies have reported the geological and geochronological data, and established a relatively systematic geochronological framework for late Mesozoic volcanic rocks in the region, which has improved our understanding of the geodynamic setting. However, the petrogenesis of these late Mesozoic volcanic rocks and the processes that caused the magmatism in this area remain controversial, and various tectonic models have been proposed for the large-scale late Mesozoic volcanism in the Great Xing'an Range, including (1) a mantle plume model (Lin et al 1998Ge et al 1999Ge et al , 2000Deng et al 2004), (2) post-orogenic gravitational collapse and subsequent extension related to closure of the MongolOkhotsk Ocean (Guo et al 2001;Fan et al 2003;Meng et al 2003;Zhang et al 2007;Gou et al 2010Gou et al , 2013Ying et al 2010;Wang et al 2013), and (3) lithospheric delamination and consequent upwelling of asthenospheric material as a result of subduction of the Palaeo-Pacific Plate beneath the eastern Asian continent (Wang et al 2006;Zhang et al 2008aZhang et al , 2010Dong et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Numerous studies have examined the late Mesozoic volcanic rocks of the Great Xing'an Range over the past decade (Zhao et al 1989;Ge et al 1999Ge et al , 2000Ge et al , 2001Guo et al 2001;Fan et al 2003;Wang et al 2006;Xu et al 2008Xu et al , 2013aZhang et al 2008aZhang et al , 2010, and these studies have reported the geological and geochronological data, and established a relatively systematic geochronological framework for late Mesozoic volcanic rocks in the region, which has improved our understanding of the geodynamic setting. However, the petrogenesis of these late Mesozoic volcanic rocks and the processes that caused the magmatism in this area remain controversial, and various tectonic models have been proposed for the large-scale late Mesozoic volcanism in the Great Xing'an Range, including (1) a mantle plume model (Lin et al 1998Ge et al 1999Ge et al , 2000Deng et al 2004), (2) post-orogenic gravitational collapse and subsequent extension related to closure of the MongolOkhotsk Ocean (Guo et al 2001;Fan et al 2003;Meng et al 2003;Zhang et al 2007;Gou et al 2010Gou et al , 2013Ying et al 2010;Wang et al 2013), and (3) lithospheric delamination and consequent upwelling of asthenospheric material as a result of subduction of the Palaeo-Pacific Plate beneath the eastern Asian continent (Wang et al 2006;Zhang et al 2008aZhang et al , 2010Dong et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, a number of previous studies indicate that basaltic magmas derived from the asthenospheric mantle commonly have lower LREE/HFSE ratios than basaltic magmas that were derived from enriched lithospheric mantle sources (Gou et al . ; Fitton et al ., ). Basaltic samples from the Ganhe Formation in the study area have relatively high La/Nb (2.09–3.18) and La/Ta (21.29–51.92), suggesting derivation from an enriched lithospheric mantle source (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Gou et al . ). The main reason for the above conflict is that the exact eruption ages of the volcanic rocks are unknown and their spatial distribution has not been determined yet (Zhang et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(a) Diagram of ε Hf (t) versus U–Pb age and (b) histogram of emplacement ages of mafic rocks, zircon Hf model ages, and xenocrystic and detrital zircon ages in the Erguna block. Neoarchean–Paleoproterozoic data from Sun, Ren, et al () and Shao et al (); Neoproterozoic data from Sun, Ren, et al (); Cambrian–Ordovician data from Ge et al () and Zhao et al (); Late Triassic–Early Jurassic data from Sun, Gou, et al (), Tang et al (), and Gou et al (); Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous data from Fan et al (), Wang et al (), Zhang et al (), Ying et al (), Meng et al (), Xu et al (), and Sun, Gou, et al () [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%