2009
DOI: 10.1561/9781601983978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodesic Methods in Computer Vision and Graphics

Abstract: This paper reviews both the theory and practice of the numerical computation of geodesic distances on Riemannian manifolds. The notion of Riemannian manifold allows one to define a local metric (a symmetric positive tensor field) that encodes the information about the problem one wishes to solve. This takes into account a local isotropic cost (whether some point should be avoided or not) and a local anisotropy (which direction should be preferred). Using this local tensor field, the geodesic distance is used t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 231 publications
(369 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we consider a simplified model, where the optical axis (the best approximation of a line passing through the optical center of the cornea, lens, and fovea) coincides with the visual axis (the line connecting fixation point and the fovea). 1 The average radius of a human eye is R ≈ 10.5 mm, and the maximum distance between nodal point N and the central point C is a max = 17 mm − 10.5 mm = 6.5 mm. Now we switch to mathematical object coordinates of the retina where we use the eyeball radius to express lengths, i.e., we have R = 1 and a max = 6.5 mm 10.5 mm ·R = 13 21 in dimensionless coordinates.…”
Section: Vessel Tracking In Spherical Images Of the Retinamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we consider a simplified model, where the optical axis (the best approximation of a line passing through the optical center of the cornea, lens, and fovea) coincides with the visual axis (the line connecting fixation point and the fovea). 1 The average radius of a human eye is R ≈ 10.5 mm, and the maximum distance between nodal point N and the central point C is a max = 17 mm − 10.5 mm = 6.5 mm. Now we switch to mathematical object coordinates of the retina where we use the eyeball radius to express lengths, i.e., we have R = 1 and a max = 6.5 mm 10.5 mm ·R = 13 21 in dimensionless coordinates.…”
Section: Vessel Tracking In Spherical Images Of the Retinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In computer vision, it is common to extract salient curves in flat images via data-driven minimal paths or geodesics [1,3,5,2,4]. The minimizing geodesic is defined as the curve that minimizes the length functional, which is typically weighted by a cost function with high values at image locations with high curve saliency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimal path model introduced by Cohen and Kimmel (1997) is a powerful tool in the fields of image analysis and medical imaging (Cohen, 2006;Peyré et al, 2010). It is designed to search for the global minimum of the weighted curve length energy (Caselles et al, 1997;Yezzi et al, 1997), measured along a curve C ∈ Lip([0, 1], Ω) as follows:…”
Section: Cohen-kimmel Minimal Path Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of well-established Eikonal solvers have been exploited such as the fast marching methods (Sethian, 1999;Mirebeau, 2014aMirebeau, ,b, 2018. The global optimality and the efficient solutions lead to a series of successful minimal path-based applications as reviewed in (Peyré et al, 2010). However, the original minimal geodesic path model (Cohen and Kimmel, 1997) depends only on the first-order derivative term of a curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by SLIC, Wang et al (2013a) implemented an algorithm SSS that considered the structural information within images. It uses the geodesic distance (Peyré et al 2010) computed by the geometric flows instead of the simple Euclidean distance. However, efficiency is poor because of the bottleneck caused by the high computational cost of measuring geodesic distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%