many
Abbreviated title: Absolute Gravimetry in the Fennoscandian Uplift AreaThe Nordic countries Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark are a key study region for the research of glacial isostasy. In addition, it offers a unique opportunity for absolute gravimetry to show its capability as a geodetic tool for geophysical research. Within a multi-national cooperation, annual absolute gravity meas-
The Fennoscandian Land UpliftIn the Fennoscandian land uplift area, the Earth's crust has been rising continuously since the last glacial maximum in response to the deloading of the ice. This process is an isostatic adjustment of the Earth's elastic lithosphere and underlying viscous mantle. For a general overview Wolf (1993) gives a historical review about the changing role of the lithosphere in models of glacial isostasy.
The Fennoscandian rebound area is dominated by the Precambrian basement rocks of the BalticShield, which is part of the ancient East European Craton and comprises South Norway, Sweden, Finland, the Kola Peninsula and Russian Karelia. The region is surrounded by a flexural bulge, covering northern Germany and northern Poland, the Netherlands and some other surrounding regions.The bulge area was once rising due the Fennoscandian ice load and, after the melting, sinking with a much smaller absolute value than the uplift rate in the centre of Fennoscandia. Denmark is part of the transition zone from the uplift to the subsidence area. The maximum spatial extension of the uplift area is about 2000 km in northeast-southwest direction; see Figure 1 for the approximate shape (after Ågren and Svensson, 2007). Presently, the central area around the northern part of the Gulf of Bothnia is undergoing an uplift at a rate of about 1 cm/year.
(Figure 1)Geophysical approaches to study the postglacial rebound are associated with the evidence for ancient shore lines and lake level data, the knowledge or assumptions about the geometry of the ice sheets (thickness, position), and some Earth model parameters (lithosphere thickness, mantle viscosity). After Lambeck et al. (1998b), the inverse solution for the sea level data includes both ice and Earth model parameters as unknowns. Despite the recent progress in understanding the underlying models, definite models for the isostatic rebound do not yet exist. Lateral rheological variations