2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2019.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodynamic setting of Upper Miocene to Quaternary alkaline basalts from Harrat al ‘Uwayrid (NW Saudi Arabia): Constraints from K Ar dating, chemical and Sr-Nd-Pb isotope compositions, and petrological modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
44
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
11
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We posit that northward asthenospheric flow of plume material from Afar has reached Harrat Ithnayn and then extended to Harrat Lunayyir west of the MMN line guided along thin lithosphere as a natural channel (Figures 10 and 11). However, this asthenospheric flow likely does not extend to Harrat Uwayrid and Harrat Hutaymah, which is consistent with geochemical studies that found no plume signal there (Altherr et al, 2019; Konrad et al, 2016). Due to thin lithosphere, plume material may have risen and caused decompression melting, leading to the formation of Harrat Lunayyir.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We posit that northward asthenospheric flow of plume material from Afar has reached Harrat Ithnayn and then extended to Harrat Lunayyir west of the MMN line guided along thin lithosphere as a natural channel (Figures 10 and 11). However, this asthenospheric flow likely does not extend to Harrat Uwayrid and Harrat Hutaymah, which is consistent with geochemical studies that found no plume signal there (Altherr et al, 2019; Konrad et al, 2016). Due to thin lithosphere, plume material may have risen and caused decompression melting, leading to the formation of Harrat Lunayyir.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This decay mode is also included in the widely used Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF) and Decay Data Evaluation Project (DDEP) evaluations (Chen, 2017;Mougeot and Helmer, 2009, respectively). However, evaluations by Endt andVan der Leun (1973, 1978), Endt (1990), and Audi et al (2003) do not explicitly include this decay mode, with Audi et al (2003) giving a transition intensity that is the combined EC* and β + intensities. Min et al (2000) have questioned its validity because there is no experimental verification and therefore do not include EC ground in their estimates.…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both processes are types of β decay and result in the transformation of a proton to a neutron to conserve charge, and they both also emit a neutrino in order to conserve lepton number and energy. These two processes are typically paired: coupled electron capture-β + is the second most abundant decay type on the chart of the nuclides, after β − decay (Audi et al, 2003). The electron capture (EC) and positron (β + ) decay modes are linked because both processes have the same initial and final nuclear states.…”
Section: Why There Must Be An Ec Ground Decay Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the effects of an EC ground decay mode are unlikely to be significant for most current applications of 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology. However, given the levels of analytical precision attainable by the K-Ar dating approach when dating geologically recent materials by K-Ar (e.g., Altherr et al 2019), the EC ground decay mode will impact the accuracy of this chronometer. 320 https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-2020-9 Preprint.…”
Section: Relevance For Geochronology 285mentioning
confidence: 99%