2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48472-3_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GeoEtypes: Harmonizing Diversity in Geospatial Data (Short Paper)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of merging methodologies, scales, and heterogeneity in remotesensing data allows data fusion on a global scale [48]. At the European level, harmonization models have been developed for geospatial data to be made compatible with the European INSPIRE Directive [49]. More specialized models for soil data have been developed for harmonization at both the global [50,51] and European scales [52,53].…”
Section: Data Harmonizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of merging methodologies, scales, and heterogeneity in remotesensing data allows data fusion on a global scale [48]. At the European level, harmonization models have been developed for geospatial data to be made compatible with the European INSPIRE Directive [49]. More specialized models for soil data have been developed for harmonization at both the global [50,51] and European scales [52,53].…”
Section: Data Harmonizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to the generation of a flexible entity graph which allows the user to query different types of content with various level of detail or to look for very specific information. The knowledge layer explicitly separates schema, vocabulary, and entity [11] which tackles the language based diversity.…”
Section: A Knowledge Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We preserve this type of semantic relations in our model which facilitates easy inference of the model. We categorize all the man made a structure like a busStation, railwayStartion, airport etc under the class transportationBuilding [2]. Moreover, to make our model comprehensible with more datasets, we gave major attention to not to use conflicting terms such as 'subways', 'underground' and 'tube'.…”
Section: Atommentioning
confidence: 99%