In the early 1970s a general disenchantment with development efforts in Third World countries led to a search for alternative development strategies and a growing awareness that women, like the poor, were peripheral to the development efforts of major aid donors. In 1972 the United Nations designated 1975 as International Women' s Year, highlighting the need to involve women in issues of economic development. During the past 20 years the`women in development' approach, which seeks to recognise and integrate women in aid policies and programmes, has been incorporated into the aid practice of most development
agencies. This paper traces the efforts of large aid agencies over the past two decades to integrate women into their aid programmes and discusses the main limitations and weaknesses of the W ID approach.Many studies of Third World women in the 1990s indicate that their impoverishment is growing, their work burdens expanding and their status relative to men declining. 1 Given the optimism of development agencies in the 1970s that a focus on women in their aid programmes would automatically improve their lives, it is pertinent to ask why so little has been achieved. It is recognised that such a question encompasses a broad and complex set of factors that cannot be addressed adequately in a single piece of work. This paper, therefore, narrows the search for possible explanations by examining some of the major aid agencies' efforts to incorporate women into their aid programmes over the past 20 years. These efforts to integrate women into their development plans are generally known as part of the`women in development' (WID) approach.The paper begins with a brief overview of the emergence of WID in the 1970s and then considers some of the main problems with this approach. It is argued that WID' s attempt to integrate women is based on certain assumptions and arguments that have limited its scope and success. Third World women have been presented in a particular way, with their problems and needs identi® ed by W ID`experts' , and their control over the development process ® rmly restricted. While WID may offer a different approach to`doing' and`viewing' development, it is not an alternative approach to mainstream development, as its concepts, strategies and perspectives on development remain welded to the existing Western-dominated development framework.