The authors read with great pleasure the protocol on surveillance of home blood pressure (BP) monitoring in India by Verma and associates. 1 Given the number of factors that may affect BP at home versus in office and diversity of the Indian population, they would like to share the following insight for future iterations of the protocol:1. There is significant variability in antihypertensive treatment options, access to care, medication adherence, and health literacy across India. 2 While the study's inclusion criteria requires stable antihypertensive regimen for at least 3 months, how stability is defined should be detailed taking aforementioned sources of variability into account as that may affect accuracy of uncontrolled BP prevalence calculations. This may include, for example, additional training on home BP measurement technique to ensure adequate health literacy. 2. Additional factors, including diet, physical activity, sleep, and mental health/stress all play vital roles in day-to-day and minute-tominute fluctuations in BP. Comprehensive assessments of these factors, which can vary widely across the diverse Indian population, are imperative to ensure internal validity. External factors such as temperature also can affect BP readings. Patients recruited from mountainous or cold northern regions may, on average, present with higher BP than warmer regions. 3 Perhaps 24-h ambulatory monitoring in a subset of individuals to capture variability in BP over the course of a day could help delineate many of these factors.3. To establish generalizable estimates, we suggest sampling across various demographic strata, including religious, geographic, and socioeconomic designations.In conclusion, the GRAND study and related studies are vitally important additions to understand the increasing prevalence of hypertension, but should ensure comprehensive evaluation of patient-level, measurement-level, and external environmental factors that may affect BP readings, especially in a diverse country like India.