2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-008-9525-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic and temporal genetic structure in Lepeophtheirus salmonis from four salmon farms along the northwest and west coasts of Ireland: results from a microsatellite analysis

Abstract: The marine ectoparasitic copepod of salmonids, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer), is a major pest of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) causing great economic impact. The spatial scales over which L. salmonis populations in different salmon farms are typically connected, and the temporal scales over which L. salmonis from the same farm typically undergo genetic change are largely unknown. These questions were posed in a small-scale geographic study of population structure in L. salmonis from four salmon fa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference (P<0.01) between Ho and He in all WPs was characterized by heterozygote deficiencies in the HWE. This difference (typical in fish populations) might have occurred from population fragmentation, the Wahlund effect (WILSON et al, 2004), endogamy (O'CONNELL; WRIGHT, 1997), or the bottleneck effect (AGOSTINHO et al, 2007). Based on these concepts, the difference in the average Ho in the 2011 and 2012 WPs might have resulted from the Wahlund effect, thus indicating a population structure in which random mating occurred (WILSON et al, 2004).…”
Section: Genetic Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference (P<0.01) between Ho and He in all WPs was characterized by heterozygote deficiencies in the HWE. This difference (typical in fish populations) might have occurred from population fragmentation, the Wahlund effect (WILSON et al, 2004), endogamy (O'CONNELL; WRIGHT, 1997), or the bottleneck effect (AGOSTINHO et al, 2007). Based on these concepts, the difference in the average Ho in the 2011 and 2012 WPs might have resulted from the Wahlund effect, thus indicating a population structure in which random mating occurred (WILSON et al, 2004).…”
Section: Genetic Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic diversity of pacu for restocking programs in the Tietê and Grandes rivers, Brazil been useful for addressing questions relative to the population diversity and genetic structure of various fish species (NOLAN;POWELL, 2009;AUNG et al, 2010;HULAK et al, 2010;HORNE et al, 2013;MERANER et al, 2013). The objective of the current, unprecedented study was to evaluate the genetic diversity of P. mesopotamicus WPs and BSs using microsatellites markers for restocking programs in the Tietê and Grande rivers (Brazil).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling on these 5 farms was conducted prior to (T1) and post delousing (T2) with medicated treatments in order to investigate whether temporal and spatial genetic variation within a small geographic region may be affected by the process of delousing, as suggested previously (Nolan & Powell 2009). Details regarding the delousing history on these 5 farms were collected.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each 96-well traycontained a minimum of 2 blank controls and Lepeophtheirus salmonis representing 1 sample. A total of 16 microsatellite loci were amplified in 3 multiplex reactions: Multiplex 1 included LsalSTA1, LsalSTA2, LsalSTA4, LsalSTA5 (Todd et al 2004) and LsNUIG14 adapted by Todd et al (2004); Multiplex 2 in clu ded Lsal103 EUVC,Lsal109EUVC,Lsal110EUVC, and LsNUIG09 (Nolan et al 2000);and Multiplex 3 included Lsal104 EUVC, Lsal105EUVC, Lsal106EUVC, Lsal108 EUVC (Messmer et al in press), LsalSTA3 (Todd et al 2004) and LsNUIG35B (Nolan & Powell 2009). Amplification conditions are available upon request from the authors.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation