2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-362358/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic Confounding in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Abstract: Gene-environment correlations can bias associations between genetic variants and complex traits in genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Here, we control for geographic sources of gene-environment correlation in GWASs on 56 complex traits (N = 69,772–271,457). Controlling for geographic region significantly decreases heritability signals for SES-related traits, most strongly for educational attainment and income, indicating that socio-economic differences between regions induce gene-environment correlations… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventh, a key limitation of MLM approaches is that endogenous, omitted variables associated with the higher-level contexts can reduce generalisability. If the aim of an analysis is solely to adjust for higher level context, then a fixed effects approach might be more appropriate (Abdellaoui et al, 2021).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventh, a key limitation of MLM approaches is that endogenous, omitted variables associated with the higher-level contexts can reduce generalisability. If the aim of an analysis is solely to adjust for higher level context, then a fixed effects approach might be more appropriate (Abdellaoui et al, 2021).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major issue of current interest is the transferability of the scores between di↵erent scenarios. In particular, the scores may not transfer easily between human populations [1,24,30], mainly due to di↵erences in allele frequencies, LD-structure, and e↵ect size. Moreover, scores may show reduced accuracy even within a single population where most above di↵erences are negligible [21], including in prediction of within-family variation [27], with changes in covariates such as socioeconomic status, age and sex leading to decreased accuracy, possibly due to Gene-by-Environment interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, recent studies show uncorrected fine-scale population structure in UK Biobank causes geographic and socioeconomic confounding that results in spurious associations with disease traits [14][15][16] This issue may be especially pertinent for the MSY, which is uniquely sensitive to population structure. 17,18 Eales et al 13 only corrected for 5 genetic principal components, which may not be adequate to rule out such confounding.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%