2017
DOI: 10.19082/4584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic distribution indices of general practitioners, midwives, pediatricians, and gynecologists in the public sector of Iran

Abstract: BackgroundHealth workforce distribution is so important in access posture, coverage and equity. Following millennium development goals (MDGs), special attention to health workforces in relation with maternal and child health is required.ObjectiveThe aim of the current study was to determine distribution of maternal and child health related workforces in Iran during 2010–2012, using inequality measures.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, data about the number of physicians and midwives obtained from Ministry … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study by Honarmand et al, the Gini coefficients of midwives in Iran were 0.18, 0.18, and 0.19 in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively, indicating that the trend of midwives' distribution was not significantly altered (30). The discrepancy between the Gini coefficients of distribution of Iranian midwives in the study by Tourani et al in 2015 and the study by the Honarmand et al in 2012 (0.40 and 0.19, respectively), as suggested about gynecologists, can be due to the sector the study was performed in (either public or private, or both).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the study by Honarmand et al, the Gini coefficients of midwives in Iran were 0.18, 0.18, and 0.19 in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively, indicating that the trend of midwives' distribution was not significantly altered (30). The discrepancy between the Gini coefficients of distribution of Iranian midwives in the study by Tourani et al in 2015 and the study by the Honarmand et al in 2012 (0.40 and 0.19, respectively), as suggested about gynecologists, can be due to the sector the study was performed in (either public or private, or both).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…One of the most important Millennium Development Goals is to create equity in access to health services, especially for vulnerable groups such as mothers and children (21,30). Since the first step for fair access to health services is the equal distribution of resources, monitoring the allocation of resources based on inequality indicators is essential (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theodorakis et al [16] measured the health inequalities in general practitioner distribution in Albania by plotting Lorenz curves and calculating Gini coefficients. Honarmand et al [17] calculated the Gini coefficient and Robin Hood index to investigate the equity in general practitioners, midwives, pediatricians, and gynecologists distribution in Iran. Wiseman [18] adopted Lorenz Curve/Gini Coefficient and Theil Index to explore the inequality in health manpower distribution in Fiji for doctors, nurses, and all health manpower (doctors, nurses, dentists and health support staff).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) Health in general and oral health in particular are affected by characteristics of health equity, such as access and distribution, and the disparities and access problems have forced many countries to improve their policies, especially the distribution of human resources. (9,10) So in Iran the oral health office in ministry of health in 2014 decided to implement the national program to improve oral and dental health equality in 6-14 year-old students in all over the country. (11,12) One of the objectives of this program was to ensure fairness in the provision of preventive services to students and the fair distribution of dental care providers throughout the programme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%