1991
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.81.suppl.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic distribution of newborn HIV seroprevalence in relation to four sociodemographic variables.

Abstract: The geographic distribution of newborn human immunodeficiency virus seroprevalence at zip code level was compared with the distribution of four sociodemographic variables. For New York City significant univariate correlations were found between HIV and low birthweight, drug use (as measured by hospital discharges), maternal education less than 12 years, and race/ethnicity. Less significant correlations were found for New York State exclusive of New York City. For New York City a model comprising low birthweigh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13][14] Between 1988 and 1994, both relative and absolute risk of AIDS increased among persons in Massachusetts living in economically deprived and densely populated block-groups. Compared with those residing in the least poor block-groups, persons residing in the poorest block-groups were burdened with an excess of 309 cases per 100 000; compared with those living in the least densely populated block-groups, those living in the most densely populated block-groups had an excess of 333 cases per 100 000; compared with those living in block-groups with the smallest percentage of high-income households, those living in block-groups with the largest percentage of high-income households had 106 fewer cases per 100000 (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11][12][13][14] Between 1988 and 1994, both relative and absolute risk of AIDS increased among persons in Massachusetts living in economically deprived and densely populated block-groups. Compared with those residing in the least poor block-groups, persons residing in the poorest block-groups were burdened with an excess of 309 cases per 100 000; compared with those living in the least densely populated block-groups, those living in the most densely populated block-groups had an excess of 333 cases per 100 000; compared with those living in block-groups with the smallest percentage of high-income households, those living in block-groups with the largest percentage of high-income households had 106 fewer cases per 100000 (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Conspicuously absent are data on economic conditions, 3 even though several US studies have reported that HIV infection occurs disproportionately and increasingly among the poor [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and 4 studies have documented the incidence of AIDS or HIV in relation to economic deprivation. [11][12][13][14] Three of these studies provided AIDS incidence data stratified by economic level for 3 cities (Philadelphia, Pa, 11 Newark, NJ, 12 and Los Angeles, Calif 13 ), while the fourth analyzed economic disparities in HIV seroprevalence among newborns in New York State.…”
Section: Economic Deprivation and Aids Incidence In Massachusettsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on HIV-infected women tends to focus on prevalence (Morse, Lessner, Medvesky, Glebatis, & Novick, 1991), women's knowledge of HIV/AIDS and of risk avoidance (Hale, Char, Nagy, & Stockert, 1993;Harrison et al, 1991), and the capacity of women to infect men (Rosser, 1991;Smeltzer & Whipple, 1991). Researchers have also explored the effect of maternal HIV/AIDS on children (Ehrnst et al, 1991;Michaels, 1992;Van de Perre et al, 1993;Wilfert, 1991).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After mandated newborn screening tests are completed, some specimens are inevitably designated as being of a "quantity not sufficient" (QNS) for HIV-1 antibody testing. The 10.04) for 1/8-in blood spots and 7.26 (range = 5.36to8.59) for 1/4-in blood spots (P < .01).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%