2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic gender differences in traumatic unintentional injury hospitalization and youth drinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we included the (6) percentage of persons 25 years of age or older completing four or more years of college, and (7) the percentage of households that average one or more persons per room. We then used principal component analysis to ascertain the weighting of each variable within the component, with “individual component values estimated by summing the weighted scores to reach the component” (Moise, 2019 ). Finally, we standardized the continuous range of SES index scores to allow census tract to be scored on a 0–100 scale, with lower values indicating concentrated disadvantage and higher values indicated concentrated advantage at the component level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we included the (6) percentage of persons 25 years of age or older completing four or more years of college, and (7) the percentage of households that average one or more persons per room. We then used principal component analysis to ascertain the weighting of each variable within the component, with “individual component values estimated by summing the weighted scores to reach the component” (Moise, 2019 ). Finally, we standardized the continuous range of SES index scores to allow census tract to be scored on a 0–100 scale, with lower values indicating concentrated disadvantage and higher values indicated concentrated advantage at the component level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other indicators included a wealth index-poor or average living) [46,47], education (women with no education, primary, secondary, or higher, percentage, %), sanitation (women living in households with safe and clean water access, having a place to wash hands, with soap or detergent present, %), employment (currently working, %), insurance coverage (%), crowding (average number of household members based on more than three people per sleeping room), distance to safe clean water (average time to get to drinking water), access to information (women owning a mobile phone (%)), and women listening to the radio at least once a week (%). These SDOH measures were selected based on the literature and conceptual frameworks [26,48,49]. Studies have linked some of these measures to COVID-19 screening and testing outcomes [44,50].…”
Section: Country-level Social Determinants Of Health Data Source Meas...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measures of interested represented geography (urban residence), wealth (Human Development Index or HDI, and indicator reported to be better than "GDP per capita" in measuring the progress of nations, particularly LMICs; and a wealth index -poor or average living) (35,36), education (women with no education, primary, secondary or higher, percentage, %), sanitation (women living in households with high quality water access, have a place to wash hands, soap or detergent present, %), employment (currently working, %), insurance coverage (%), crowding (average number of household members based on more than three people per sleeping room), distance to safe clean water (average time to get to drinking water), access to information (women owning a mobile phone (%)) and women listening to the radio at least once a week (%). The DHS SDOH measures of interest were selected based on the literature and conceptual SDOH frameworks (21,37,38). These measures are associated with differentiating COVID-19 screening and testing outcomes (30,39).…”
Section: Country-level Social Determinants Of Health Data Source Meas...mentioning
confidence: 99%