Geographic Information Metadata—An Outlook from the International Standardization Perspective

Abstract

Geographic information metadata provides a detailed description of geographic information resources. Well before digital data emerged, metadata were shown in the margins of paper maps to inform the reader of the name of the map, the scale, the orientation of the magnetic North, the projection used, the coordinate systems, the legend, and so on. Metadata were used to communicate practical information for the proper use of maps. When geographic information entered the digital era with geographic information systems, metadata was also collected digitally to describe datasets and the dataset collections for various purposes. Initially, metadata were collected and saved in digital files by data producers for their own specific needs. The sharing of geographic datasets that required producers to provide metadata with the dataset to guide proper use of the dataset—map scale, data sources, extent, datum, coordinate reference system, etc. Because of issues with sharing and no common understanding of metadata requirements, the need for metadata standardization was recognized by the geographic information community worldwide. The ISO technical committee 211 was created in 1994 with the scope of standardization in the field of digital geographic information to support interoperability. In the early years of the committee, standardization of metadata was initiated for different purposes, which culminated in the ISO 19115:2003 standard. Now, there are many ISO Geographic information standards that covers the various aspect of geographic information metadata. This paper traces an illustration of the development and evolution of the requirements and international standardization activities of geographic information metadata standards, profiles and resources, and how these attest to facilitating the discovery, evaluation, and appropriate use of geographic information in various contexts.

Open Geospatial Software and Data: A Review of the Current State and A Perspective into the Future

“…Another example is the SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog (STAC), a community-driven catalog initiative based on JSON [38] with the aim of increasing the interoperability of searching for satellite imagery. The three key international standardization organizations attach great importance to harmonization and backward compatibility among standards, not only among those published within their respective organizations, but also between the standardization organizations [120]. Isolated standards do not have to consider such "baggage" and are not encumbered by governance rules of large organizations, but they run the risk of impeding interoperability if they are not harmonized with other widely used standards.…”

Open Community-Based Crowdsourcing Geoportal for Earth Observation Products: A Model Design and Prototype Implementation

“…Some OGC standard services such as Web Coverage Service (WCS), the Web Map Service (WMS), the Web Feature Service (WFS), and the Catalog Service for Web (CSW) have been frequently used in the design of geoportal architectures [61,62]. Service metadata can also be published based on standards such as ISO19115 and ISO19139 [63].…”

Towards SDG 4: Trade-Offs for Geospatial Open Educational Resources

“…We included ISO 19115:2003 in this study because of the lack of geospatially related metadata elements in the Dublin Core and IEEE LOM metadata schemas. The ISO 19115 standard is widely used in the geospatial community to describe geospatial data and services (Brodeur et al, 2019). For example, Research Data Australia (RDA https://researchdata.ands.org.au/) provides access to metadata for more than 140,000 data collections across various domains and the Australian Urban Research Infrastructure provides access to over 5,000 datasets described according to ISO 19115 metadata elements (Delaney and Pettit, 2014;Pettit et al, 2015;Pettit et al, 2020;Sinnott et al, 2014).…”