2000
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2000.45.8.1778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic information system (GIS) analysis of ecosystem invasion: Exotic mussels in Lake Erie

Abstract: Geographic information system (GIS) analysis with bathymetric, substrate, and side scan sonar (SSS) data was used to assess both spatial and temporal expansion of exotic dreissenid mussels onto sedimentary habitats in Lake Erie. These data were used for developing multiple regression models with substrate types and SSS data to interpret the expansion of Dreissena assemblages across the central and western basins of Lake Erie from 1994 to 1998. The 1994-1996 GIS model predicted the 1997 SSS measurements of Drei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Lake Erie, dreissenid mussels (both zebra and quagga mussels) have colonized a considerable portion of the lake bottom (~70%), including both hard and soft substrata (Dermott & Munawar 1993, Haltuch et al 2000. Although currently there are no estimates of filtering impacts by dreissenid mussels in the central basin, estimates by MacIsaac et al (1992) suggest that the mussels could filter 14 times the volume of the western basin in just 1 d. With this in mind, it is likely that dreissenids have increased the rate of P recycling back into the water column by filtering planktonic materials and excreting nutrients (Nichols et al 1999) that would otherwise be lost to benthic sediment.…”
Section: Phytoplankton-phosphorus Dynamics In Lake Eriementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Lake Erie, dreissenid mussels (both zebra and quagga mussels) have colonized a considerable portion of the lake bottom (~70%), including both hard and soft substrata (Dermott & Munawar 1993, Haltuch et al 2000. Although currently there are no estimates of filtering impacts by dreissenid mussels in the central basin, estimates by MacIsaac et al (1992) suggest that the mussels could filter 14 times the volume of the western basin in just 1 d. With this in mind, it is likely that dreissenids have increased the rate of P recycling back into the water column by filtering planktonic materials and excreting nutrients (Nichols et al 1999) that would otherwise be lost to benthic sediment.…”
Section: Phytoplankton-phosphorus Dynamics In Lake Eriementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native unionids and macrophytes are also common substrates for zebra mussel colonization (Lewandowski, 1976, Ricciardi et al, 1996, Diggins et al, 2004. Over time, adult zebra mussels also started to use soft sediments (Haltuch et al 2000, Jones & Ricciardi 2005, but again preferably colonized hard substrate and their density was determined by substrate size (Dermott & Munawar 1993, Mellina & Rasmussen 1994, Karatayev et al 1998, Jones & Ricciardi 2005. In the St. Lawrence River, 10 years after invasion, substrate size accounted for 20% of the variation in zebra mussel biomass (Jones & Ricciardi 2005).…”
Section: Substrate Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neary & Leach (1992) evaluated the zebra mussel colonization risk with a GIS and mapped the potential spread of the species in Ontario by matching mussel tolerances to pH and Ca to data from 6 151 lakes. Other authors also use GIS to predict the spatial distribution of zebra mussel (Doll, 1998;Koutnik & Padilla, 1994;Haltuch et al, 2000). The goal of the present project was to determine the risk of zebra mussel infestation in water bodies in the North-West region of Bulgaria by combining available biological and environmental data and by subsequent processing and analyzing of these data using Geographic Information System.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modelação espacial da adequabilidade para espécies invasoras tem-se baseado sobretudo nestas ferramentas e metodologias (Peterson e Vieglais, 1999;Haltuch et al, 2000;Underwood et al, 2004;Ficetola et al, 200); no entanto, um aspecto essencial diverge da abordagem geral destes modelos e da modelação de habitats potenciais para espécies exóticas invasoras, que se prende com o pressuposto de que as espécies nativas se encontram em equilíbrio com o ecossistema (Guisan e zimmerman, 2000). O facto de o período temporal de interacção com o meio ser muitas vezes reduzido, leva a que em muitos casos as espécies invasoras não tenham ainda sido confrontadas com todas as adversidades que este lhes pode imputar, reduzindo as suas áreas de colonização.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified