Geographic locale and relative dominance patterns among North American passerine communities

Abstract

Numerous studies have addressed variation in the local occurrence and abundance of species, but only recently have investigators begun considering the influence of spatial context on community structure. We examined the influence of geographic position within a species' range on its dominance (relative abundance) within the community. Our three primary questions were: 1) Does dominance within a community vary across a species' range? 2) Do dominance-location trends differ between widely and narrowly distributed species? and 3) Does dominance within a guild vary across a species range? We examined 40 passerine species (20 widely distributed, 20 narrowly distributed) and their communities using North American Breeding Bird Survey data, of which, a subset of 11 species belonging to a single foraging guild were used for addressing guild effects. Data were gathered from communities at the center (10 locations) and periphery (10 locations) of each species' range. Focal species were significantly less dominant at locations on the periphery of their ranges compared to central locations, and did not differ between widely and narrowly distributed species. In examining factors influencing these patterns, it was found that narrowly distributed species occur in communities of fewer individuals and fewer species compared to widely distributed species irrespective of locale. Within the foraging guild, dominance was also lower at the periphery than at the center of focal species' ranges. However, guild abundance was also lower at the periphery of ranges while guild richness did not vary with locale. Specifically, focal species abundance decreased at a greater rate than abundance of other members of the foraging guild. Contrary to overall community data, widely distributed species were more dominant members of their guild at the center of their ranges. No significant patterns were found between distribution and guild dominance at the periphery of ranges.

Uneven Rates of Landscape Change as a Source of Bias in Roadside Wildlife Surveys

“…These results were apparent in previous studies of cover type sample bias in BBS routes (Keller and Scallan 1999) and along roads in general (Bart et al 1995). This is problematic if roadside data are used to estimate and then compare species abundances (as opposed to trends) at landscape, regional, or continental scales (e.g., O'Connor et al 1996, Husak and Linder 2004, La Sorte and Boecklen 2005. Differences in the proportion of birds counted due to roadside variability in habitat could be misinterpreted as geographic differences in population size (Bart et al 1995).…”

A closer examination of the ‘abundant centre’ hypothesis for reef fishes

“…While the ‘abundant centre’ pattern has been originally considered ubiquitous (Brown, 1984; Brown et al., 1995; Husak & Linder, 2004; Sorte & Homfman, 2004), empirical tests of this pattern have found mixed results (Pironon, Papuga, Angert, María, & Thompson, 2017; Sagarin & Gaines, 2002b). Specific analyses vary greatly in their fit to an ‘abundant centre’ pattern, with some species displaying a good fit and others contradicting it (e.g.…”

Host heterogeneity dominates West Nile virus transmission

“…Although large numbers of corvids (birds in the family Corvidae, including jays and crows) have been found dead and tested positive for WNV Garvin et al 2004;Reisen et al 2004), corvids rarely make up more than ten percent of the individuals in most communities, except near roosts (Husak & Linder 2004;Sauer et al 2005). House sparrows (Passer domesticus), a widespread and abundant species, have been hypothesized to be important in WNV transmission because of their abundance and evidence of their exposure to WNV (Komar et al 2001).…”