Geographic range determinants of two commercially important marine molluscs

Abstract

Aim We modelled the spatial abundance patterns of two abalone species (Haliotis rubra Donovan 1808 and H. laevigata Leach 1814) inhabiting inshore rocky reefs to better understand the importance of current sea surface temperature (SST) (among other predictors) and, ultimately, the effect of future climate change, on marine molluscs. Location Southern Australia. Methods We used an ensemble species distribution modelling approach that combined likelihood‐based generalized linear models and boosted regression trees. For each modelling technique, a two‐step procedure was used to predict: (1) the current probability of presence, followed by (2) current abundance conditional on presence. The resulting models were validated using an independent, spatially explicit dataset of abalone abundance patterns in Victoria. Results For both species, the presence of reef was the main driver of abalone occurrence, while SST was the main driver of spatial abundance patterns. Predictive maps at c. 1‐km resolution showed maximal abundance on shallow coastal reefs characterized by mild winter SSTs for both species. Main conclusions Sea surface temperature was a major driver of abundance patterns for both abalone species, and the resulting ensemble models were used to build fine‐resolution predictive range maps (c. 1 km) that incorporate measures of habitat suitability and quality in support of resource management. By integrating this output with structured spatial population models, a more robust understanding of the potential impacts of threatening human processes such as climate change can be established.

Impacts of Climate Variability on Latin American Small-scale Fisheries

“…Owing to their strict association with sedimentological variables (Defeo and McLachlan 2011), several shellfishes are unable to adapt their distribution to compensate for warming temperatures and other climate change consequences, such as ocean acidification and sea level rise (Defeo et al 2009, Heath et al 2012, Narita et al 2012. These drivers could affect habitats and biophysical processes and thus could alter shellfish demography, dispersal patterns, life history traits, and interaction strength with other species (Stenseth et al 2002, Rouyer et al 2008, Mellin et al 2012. Potential impacts resulting from climatic drivers can be related to the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), and the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which account for major variations in weather and climate around the world (Stenseth et al 2002).…”

Genetic inference as a method for modelling occurrence: A viable alternative to visual surveys

“…After establishing the most parsimonious habitat and anthropogenic human models we then explored, more generally, the relative importance of these types of conditions on occurrence. A similar approach was used elsewhere (Mellin et al 2012). We compared and ranked models using Akaike's information criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc) (Burnham & Anderson 2002).…”

Remote sensing of intertidal habitats predicts West Indian topsnail population expansion but reveals scale-dependent bias

“…For terrestrial environments, climate variables, such as air temperature and precipitation are often combined with remote sensing to predict the distribution of habitats (e.g., Buermann et al 2008;Wang et al 2010). For marine environments, climate variables are good predictors of habitat distribution at a global scale (Mellin et al 2012;Spalding et al 2007;Tyberghein et al 2012), but they are poor predictors on a local scale. On a local scale, physical characteristics and processes such as substrate, upwelling/downwelling, and wave action are more relevant.…”