T here is little structure or best practice in the concise biographical texts found in biographical dictionaries and Who's Who volumes. This paper is a progress report on an investigation of using events as a structuring device for mark-up and metadata structures in biographical texts as part of a project entitled Bringing Lives to Light: Biography in Context [1]. The idea is that anyone's life can be usefully decomposed into events at any desired level of granularity and that each event could be described as a 4-tuple of the four facets what, where, when and who.
PurposeThe difference between seeing and understanding lies in knowing the context, and it should be emphasized that we approached this problem area from a particular perspective: helping readers to understand. This paper reports on one part of a series of studies of how learning can be facilitated by making it easier to find relatively trustworthy explanatory resources, suitable both for a text being read and for the reader. During 2004-2006 a project entitled "Support for the Learner: What, Where, When and Who" explored this area in general terms [2]. A four-facet "4W" approach was adoptedwhat, where, when and who -because each has distinctive characteristics leading to different genres of search aid and different display requirements.Where involves a duality of place (a cultural construct) and space (a physical construct) and, for this, place name gazetteers and map displays are well-developed genres [3] [4]. When similarly involves a duality of events and calendar time. Historical events are calibrated by calendar time, and calendar time is calibrated by events such as solar years and cesium radiation cycles. In practice, people tend to mark time by mentioning personal and historical events (for example, "after I graduated," "during [the] Vietnam [war]") more than by calendar dates, so an approach similar to place name gazetteers using named time period directories and timelines can be adopted [5]. What tends to be a residual category when other specialized concepts have been removed. Here thesauri, subject indexes, library classifications and other tools are used, and ways to express and display relationships and cross-references are well developed.Who, however, emerged as a relatively underdeveloped area. The disambiguation of personal names -associating multiple names for the same person and distinguishing different persons with the same name -is a well-understood area with its own standards. Also, genealogists understand family relationships and how to represent them in family trees, but other kinds of interpersonal relationships have not received the same careful attention, although a variety of limited examples can be found. Further, there seemed to be a distinct lack of accepted standards or best practices for structuring the very concentrated, stylized biographical texts found in biographical dictionaries. Our impression of the situation was validated and detailed in a report issued by the Text Encoding Initiative [6]. Fortunately we have b...