2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00475.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic variation in genital morphology of Ciulfina praying mantids

Abstract: Geographic variation in morphological traits is widespread and important to our current understanding of evolutionary processes. Although male genitalia are perhaps the most divergent morphological traits in animals, geographic variation in genital traits has received little attention and the mechanism driving such variation is unclear. The species isolation hypothesis of genital evolution makes explicit predictions about geographic variation in genitalia predicting patterns of genital divergence that reflect … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some minor variation due to differences in angle of view will undoubtedly remain, attempts were made to position each genital structure in a similar way so as to reduce this variation. Previously, the same methods have been used successfully to determine fine‐scale variation in the same genital structures between different geographic populations (Holwell, 2008). The relative position of these structures in situ , and their appearance after dissection are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While some minor variation due to differences in angle of view will undoubtedly remain, attempts were made to position each genital structure in a similar way so as to reduce this variation. Previously, the same methods have been used successfully to determine fine‐scale variation in the same genital structures between different geographic populations (Holwell, 2008). The relative position of these structures in situ , and their appearance after dissection are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset resulting from this analysis can then be reduced using principal components analysis to a more manageable series of variables that summarize the shape variation within a sample. Elliptic Fourier analysis has been utilized successfully to analyse shape variation in a number of studies of insect genitalia (Arnqvist, 1998; Monti et al, 2001; Holwell, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in body size often also influences other traits, such as number and size of offspring (Roff 1992;Stearns 1992;Kiefer et al 2008). Sexual traits may also vary between populations, including bird song (e.g., Podos and Warren 2007), sexual ornaments (e.g., Hill 1994;Møller 1995), testis size (Pitcher and Stutchbury 1998;Dziminski et al 2010), and genital morphology (e.g., Holwell 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal component scores obtained can be used as values of morphological features in subsequent analysis, such as analysis of the shapes of biological organs. Elliptic Fourier Analysis (EFA) has been successfully used to analyze shape variation in a wide number of insect genitalia studies [21,23,24,25,26,27,28] The aim of this study was to statistically confirm the statements of Josifov and MartinezCascales [1,8] of discriminating between the left paramere of M. pygmaeus and M. melanotoma using EFA, and to compare the results with those of M. costalis as a reference species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%