2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic Variation in Maternal Smoking during Pregnancy in the Missouri Adolescent Female Twin Study (MOAFTS)

Abstract: ObjectiveDespite well-known adverse health effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy (MSP), it is still unclear if MSP varies geographically and if neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation (SED) plays an important role in MSP. This study aims to investigate small-area geographic variation in MSP and examine the association of SED with MSP.MethodsThe Missouri Adolescent Female Twin Study (MOAFTS) is a cohort study of female like-sex twins born in Missouri to Missouri-resident parents during 1975–1985. Biologic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Residence in an economically deprived neighborhood may be a risk factor for antenatal smoking (Finch et al, 2001;Sellström et al, 2008;Nkansah-Amankra, 2010;Räisänen et al, 2014), although Lian et al (2016) find no effect of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation. Pickett et al (2002) have shown that living in a primarily working-class neighborhood in California increases the risk of antenatal smoking, above and beyond mother's own social class status (here, a working-class neighborhood was indicated by the proportion of residents in administrative support, sales, service, operator and laborer occupations).…”
Section: Prevalence and Predictors Of Antenatal Smokingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Residence in an economically deprived neighborhood may be a risk factor for antenatal smoking (Finch et al, 2001;Sellström et al, 2008;Nkansah-Amankra, 2010;Räisänen et al, 2014), although Lian et al (2016) find no effect of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation. Pickett et al (2002) have shown that living in a primarily working-class neighborhood in California increases the risk of antenatal smoking, above and beyond mother's own social class status (here, a working-class neighborhood was indicated by the proportion of residents in administrative support, sales, service, operator and laborer occupations).…”
Section: Prevalence and Predictors Of Antenatal Smokingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The highest SED quartile signified a neighborhood with the most deprived category of socioeconomic condition. The study found that mothers who lived in neighborhoods with the highest SED quartiles were more likely to smoke during pregnancy than those in neighborhoods with the lowest SED quartiles [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Mothers who reported smoking 100 or more cigarettes were asked if they smoked while pregnant and, if so, for how many weeks or months. Consistent with prior work (Lian et al, 2016), two variables were coded: (a) whether mother smoked during the fi rst trimester, even before knowing she was pregnant and (b) whether mother continued smoking beyond the fi rst trimester, the latter to refl ect chronicity of SDP. Mothers who never smoked or smoked fewer than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime were included in the reference group, along with mothers who smoked 100 or more cigarettes but did not smoke while pregnant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of sociodemographic predictors were also modeled as covariates in PSAs: maternal educational attainment (years of schooling), maternal age at twins' birth, maternal year of birth, parity (whether twins are mother's fi rstborn), and socioeconomic deprivation of the neighborhood at the time of twins' birth. Using common factor principal components analysis, a neighborhood (census tract) socioeconomic deprivation variable was constructed using eight items identifi ed from 20 census tract-level socioeconomic indicators from 1980 Census data, and matched to residential addresses listed on twins' birth records (Lian et al, 2016). Resulting composite scores for neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation ranged from -1.12 to 6.45, with higher values representing greater deprivation.…”
Section: Sociodemographic Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%