2001
DOI: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic variation in patient and hospital characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolysis. Results from InTIME-II

Abstract: Significant geographic variations in practice and adjusted mortality following fibrinolysis persist despite recent guidelines. These findings have important implications in the design and interpretation of international studies, identify under- and over-utilized therapies, and support further study of treatments with marked worldwide variations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis also confirmed the low use of invasive revascularization procedures in Eastern Europe identified in previous registries and trials, but failed to correlate this trend with poor outcomes [14][15][16]. Adjustment for differences in revascularization rates actually exacerbated the differences in outcomes found between Eastern Europe and other regions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our analysis also confirmed the low use of invasive revascularization procedures in Eastern Europe identified in previous registries and trials, but failed to correlate this trend with poor outcomes [14][15][16]. Adjustment for differences in revascularization rates actually exacerbated the differences in outcomes found between Eastern Europe and other regions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…20 Reasons for the differences between our observations and theirs may reflect a smaller gradient in revascularization across the four geographic regions shown and the differences in analytical approaches employed. Recent data from Stenestrand and Wallentin in patients with both NSTEMI and STEMI from a Swedish registry seem to reaffirm our finding of a mortality benefit in the first year from revascularization following STEMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This might have been the reason behind the delayed hospital presentation and lower reperfusion rate. Previous studies suggest that when regional differences are detected they can be linked to higher revascularization rates and not to the baseline patient characteristics [16,17] . Reductions in barriers to timely administration of thrombolytic therapy were previously shown to result in improved survival [18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%